Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CompSource Mutual Insurance CompanyCompSource Mutual Insurance Company
VS
Sunshine Insurance GroupSunshine Insurance Group
CompSource Mutual Insurance Company

CompSource Mutual Insurance Company

1901 N Walnut Ave, Oklahoma City, 73105, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
721/1000Moderate

For more than 90 years, Oklahoma businesses have partnered with CompSource Mutual as a reliable, trusted source for workers’ compensation insurance. Over the years, the company has evolved but its commitment to the Oklahoma business community has remained the same. This...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:364
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Sunshine Insurance Group

Sunshine Insurance Group

朝外大街, 朝阳区, 100020, CN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sinosig.com/
766/1000Fair

Established in July 2005, Sunshine Insurance Group has experienced sustainable development, now ranking among the Top 7 insurance groups in China, with an annual business income of $12.6 billion in 2016. Sunshine is composed of Property and Casualty Insurance, Life Insu...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:10,340
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CompSource Mutual Insurance Company

CompSource Mutual Insurance Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sunshine Insurance Group

Sunshine Insurance Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CompSource Mutual Insurance Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sunshine Insurance Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CompSource Mutual Insurance Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CompSource Mutual Insurance Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sunshine Insurance Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sunshine Insurance Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CompSource Mutual Insurance Company

CompSource Mutual Insurance Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
COM1010090725
Sunshine Insurance Group

Sunshine Insurance Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between CompSource Mutual Insurance Company company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CompSource Mutual Insurance Company company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CompSource Mutual Insurance Company company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CompSource Mutual Insurance Company company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CompSource Mutual Insurance Company company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CompSource Mutual Insurance Company company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CompSource Mutual Insurance Company company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CompSource Mutual Insurance Company company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CompSource Mutual Insurance Company company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CompSource Mutual Insurance Company company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CompSource Mutual Insurance Company company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CompSource Mutual Insurance Company and Sunshine Insurance Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CompSource Mutual Insurance Company and Sunshine Insurance Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CompSource Mutual Insurance Company or Sunshine Insurance Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CompSource Mutual Insurance Company or Sunshine Insurance Group ?
Between CompSource Mutual Insurance Company and Sunshine Insurance Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CompSource Mutual Insurance Company and Sunshine Insurance Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA