Comparison Overview

Complexul National Muzeal ASTRA

VS

Museum of Vancouver

Complexul National Muzeal ASTRA

None
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.muzeulastra.ro

Structura muzeala cu profil etnografic, cu patru unitati muzeale, specializate pe etnografie romaneasca (Muzeul Civilizatiei Populare Traditionale ASTRA), saseasca (Muzeul de Etnografie si Arta Populara Saseasca "Emil Sigerus"), transilvana (Muzeul Civilizatiei Transilvane ASTRA) si universala (Muzeul de Etnografie Universala "Franz Binder"). In cadrul C.N.M. ASTRA (transmis generic cu formula simplificata Muzeul ASTRA) functioneaza de asemenea ASTRA Film, unitate specializata in realizarea de filme documentare cu profil antropologic, in arhive foto si video etc.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Museum of Vancouver

1100 Chestnut Street, Vancouver, BC, V6J 3J9, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.museumofvancouver.ca

Museum of Vancouver has a rich and vibrant history as the oldest cultural institution in the City of Vancouver. The Museum’s mission is vital and unique: to deepen our understanding of Vancouver through stories, objects, and shared experiences. By supporting MOV you help us inspire a socially connected, civically engaged city through public participation, dialogue, and programming that emphasizes the organizations main pillars: Reconciliation, Immigration and Diversity, Environment and Sustainability, and Urban and Contemporary Issues

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/complexul-national-muzeal-astra.jpeg
Complexul National Muzeal ASTRA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-vancouver.jpeg
Museum of Vancouver
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Complexul National Muzeal ASTRA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Museum of Vancouver
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Complexul National Muzeal ASTRA in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of Vancouver in 2026.

Incident History — Complexul National Muzeal ASTRA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Complexul National Muzeal ASTRA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Museum of Vancouver (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of Vancouver cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/complexul-national-muzeal-astra.jpeg
Complexul National Muzeal ASTRA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-vancouver.jpeg
Museum of Vancouver
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Complexul National Muzeal ASTRA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Museum of Vancouver company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Museum of Vancouver company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Complexul National Muzeal ASTRA company.

In the current year, Museum of Vancouver company and Complexul National Muzeal ASTRA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Museum of Vancouver company nor Complexul National Muzeal ASTRA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Museum of Vancouver company nor Complexul National Muzeal ASTRA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Museum of Vancouver company nor Complexul National Muzeal ASTRA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Complexul National Muzeal ASTRA company nor Museum of Vancouver company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Complexul National Muzeal ASTRA nor Museum of Vancouver holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Complexul National Muzeal ASTRA company nor Museum of Vancouver company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Museum of Vancouver company employs more people globally than Complexul National Muzeal ASTRA company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Complexul National Muzeal ASTRA nor Museum of Vancouver holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Complexul National Muzeal ASTRA nor Museum of Vancouver holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Complexul National Muzeal ASTRA nor Museum of Vancouver holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Complexul National Muzeal ASTRA nor Museum of Vancouver holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Complexul National Muzeal ASTRA nor Museum of Vancouver holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Complexul National Muzeal ASTRA nor Museum of Vancouver holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References