Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

„Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva„Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva
VS
Marsh McLennan AgencyMarsh McLennan Agency
„Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva

„Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva

Ukmergės g. 280 , Vilnius, LT

Last Update: 15/03/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

Verslo, kelionių, turto ir kitos draudimo paslaugos, kurias lanksčiai pritaikome kiekvieno kliento poreikiams, o pagalbą teikiame kiekviename žingsnyje. Vairuojate elektromobilį? 🚙 KASKO draudimas elektromobiliams Naudojate saulės energiją? 🌱 Žaliasis draudimas Sudar...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:481
Subsidiaries:44
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Marsh McLennan Agency

Marsh McLennan Agency

360 Hamilton Ave, White Plains, US

Last Update: 08/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.marshmma.com/
760/1000Fair

Marsh McLennan Agency, a business of Marsh (NYSE: MRSH), is a leading provider of business insurance, employee health & benefits, retirement & wealth, and private client insurance solutions across the US and Canada. Marsh is a global leader in risk, reinsurance and capi...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:14,372
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
„Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva

„Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Marsh McLennan Agency

Marsh McLennan Agency

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marsh McLennan Agency in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva (X = Date, Y = Severity)

„Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Marsh McLennan Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marsh McLennan Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
„Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva

„Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Marsh McLennan Agency

Marsh McLennan Agency

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAR401072525

FAQ

Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva and Marsh McLennan Agency, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva and Marsh McLennan Agency, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva or Marsh McLennan Agency ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva or Marsh McLennan Agency ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva and Marsh McLennan Agency, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva and Marsh McLennan Agency, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-94057
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1 allows SMTP smuggling in which the received message does not match any sent message, and instead depends on crafted data sent after a rejection during DATA processing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94056
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when Proxy-Protocol is used with an attacker-controlled proxy, allows attackers to read certain uninitialized data from stack memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94055
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when certain non-default TLS settings are used with GnuTLS, has a use-after-free.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94054
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when Proxy-Protocol is used with an attacker-controlled proxy, has an out-of-bounds write.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-93993
SUMMARY

Mistral Vibe before 2.25.5 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the worktree creation process that executes git hooks before trust validation. Attackers can supply a repository with a crafted post-checkout hook that executes arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of the user running Vibe.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8