Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

„Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva„Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva
VS
GEICOGEICO
„Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva

„Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva

Ukmergės g. 280 , Vilnius, LT

Last Update: 15/03/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

Verslo, kelionių, turto ir kitos draudimo paslaugos, kurias lanksčiai pritaikome kiekvieno kliento poreikiams, o pagalbą teikiame kiekviename žingsnyje. Vairuojate elektromobilį? 🚙 KASKO draudimas elektromobiliams Naudojate saulės energiją? 🌱 Žaliasis draudimas Sudar...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:481
Subsidiaries:44
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
GEICO

GEICO

5260 Western Avenue, Chevy Chase, 20815, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
762/1000Fair

At GEICO, we offer a rewarding career where your ambitions are met with endless possibilities. Every day we honor our iconic brand by offering quality coverage to millions of customers and being there when they need us most. We thrive on relentless innovation to exceed...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:31,322
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
„Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva

„Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GEICO

GEICO

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GEICO in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva (X = Date, Y = Severity)

„Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GEICO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GEICO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
„Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva

„Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
GEICO

GEICO

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
GEI428072525

FAQ

Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva company and GEICO company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva company and GEICO company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva company and GEICO company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva company and GEICO company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva company and GEICO company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva company and GEICO company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva company and GEICO company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva company and GEICO company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva company and GEICO company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva company and GEICO company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva company and GEICO company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva and GEICO, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva and GEICO, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva or GEICO ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva or GEICO ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva and GEICO, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between „Compensa Vienna Insurance Group“ Lietuva and GEICO, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9044
SUMMARY

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the VPN module of TP-Link AXE75 V1 routers. This vulnerability allows an adjacent, authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device by importing a specially crafted VPN client configuration file. The issue arises from improper filtering of special characters.  Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may enable an attacker to gain full control of the affected device, potentially compromising configuration integrity, network security, and service availability.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-54909
SUMMARY

pion/stun is a Go implementation of STUN. Prior to 3.1.3, XORMappedAddress.GetFromAs can panic while parsing a malformed short XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS attribute in STUN or ICE Binding-response parsing paths, allowing remote denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54785
SUMMARY

gemini-bridge is a lightweight MCP server bridging AI agents to Google's Gemini AI via the official CLI. From 1.0.0 until 1.3.1, consult_gemini_with_files in inline mode read any file path supplied in the files argument without confining it to the working directory, then forwarded the contents to the Gemini CLI. Because the caller also controls query, the file contents are echoed back through the Gemini round-trip (and sent to Google), making this an arbitrary local file read. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-54768
SUMMARY

WPGraphQL provides a GraphQL API for WordPress sites. From 2.0.0 until 2.15.1, the deprecated user field on SendPasswordResetEmailPayload lets an unauthenticated caller distinguish existing author-class accounts through the sendPasswordResetEmail mutation and obtain public profile fields. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-53573
SUMMARY

GeoNetwork is a catalog application to manage spatially referenced resources. From 3.12.0 until 4.2.16 and 4.4.11, unsafe redirect validation in GeonetworkOAuth2LoginAuthenticationFilter and KeycloakAuthenticationProcessingFilter permits an attacker-controlled external redirect after login. This issue is fixed in versions 4.2.16 and 4.4.11.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA