Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian BranchCompensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch
VS
GallagherGallagher
Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch

Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch

Vienības gatve 87h, Riga, LV-1004, LV

Last Update: 21/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.compensalife.lv
752/1000Fair

Vienna Insurance Group is one of the traditional European insurance groups with almost 200 years of experience. The company has its roots in Austria, in its arts and cultural capital Vienna. The values of the old European city continue to live in Compensa today – the ar...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:58
Subsidiaries:42
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Gallagher

Gallagher

2850 Golf Road, Rolling Meadows, 60008, US

Last Update: 10/06/2026

View Profile
765/1000Fair

Gallagher, a global insurance brokerage, risk management, and consulting firm, serves communities around the globe, helping clients address risk, protecting assets, and recovering from losses. The products and services we provide keep businesses and institutions running...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:46,421
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch

Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Gallagher

Gallagher

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gallagher in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Gallagher (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gallagher cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch

Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Gallagher

Gallagher

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
GAL24413322
🔒 Incident : Breach
GAL849072625
🔒 Incident : Breach
GAL049072425

FAQ

Between Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch company and Gallagher company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch company and Gallagher company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch company and Gallagher company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch company and Gallagher company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch company and Gallagher company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch company and Gallagher company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch company and Gallagher company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch company and Gallagher company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch company and Gallagher company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch company and Gallagher company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch company and Gallagher company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch and Gallagher, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch and Gallagher, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch or Gallagher ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch or Gallagher ?
Between Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch and Gallagher, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Compensa Life Vienna Insurance Group SE Latvian Branch and Gallagher, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9754
SUMMARY

An authenticated user with the read role may read limited amounts of uninitialized stack memory via specially-crafted issuances of the filemd5 command

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-09
UPDATED
Date2026-06-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-9753
SUMMARY

The $_internalApplyOplogUpdate aggregation pipeline stage can be used to execute a document diff containing a malformed binary diff to return memory out-of-bounds or crash the server. $_internalApplyOplogUpdate can be executed by any authenticated user with access to the aggregate command.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-09
UPDATED
Date2026-06-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-9752
SUMMARY

An authorized user could trigger a server crash by running a query with a 2dsphere index on a field that stores a GeoJSON GeometryCollection containing a Polygon with a strict-winding CRS. Strict-winding polygons are intentionally unsupported for indexing, but the guard that rejects them does not inspect members of a GeometryCollection, allowing the unsafe path to be reached which ends with an ensuing null-pointer dereference.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-09
UPDATED
Date2026-06-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-9751
SUMMARY

The ldapQueryPassword parameter, when set through the runtime setParameter command, will log the new password to the mongod.log file in plain text.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-09
UPDATED
Date2026-06-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-9750
SUMMARY

An authenticated user can cause a MongoDB server to crash or return incorrect results by creating documents that interfere with internal metadata processing during query execution. This stems from insufficient separation between user-controlled document fields and internal metadata in certain execution paths.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-09
UPDATED
Date2026-06-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8