Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāleCompensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle
VS
Swiss ReSwiss Re
Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle

Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle

Vienības gatve 87H, Rīga, undefined, LV-1004, LV

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.compensa.lv
751/1000Fair

Esam uzņēmums, kas vienmēr domā ilgtermiņā. Mūsu darbības pamatā ir godīgums un atklātība attiecībā pret katru sadarbības partneri un klientu. Compensa īpašnieka Vienna Insurance Group teju divsimt gadu ilgā pieredze apdrošināšanas tirgū ir pierādījums, ka ar savu attie...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:64
Subsidiaries:40
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Swiss Re

Swiss Re

Mythenquai 50/60, Zurich, 8022, CH

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.swissre.com
810/1000Good

The Swiss Re Group is a leading wholesale provider of reinsurance, insurance and other insurance-based forms of risk transfer. Dealing direct and working through brokers, its global client base consists of insurance companies, mid-to-large-sized corporations and public ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:15,154
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle

Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Swiss Re

Swiss Re

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swiss Re in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Swiss Re (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swiss Re cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle

Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Swiss Re

Swiss Re

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle company and Swiss Re company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle company and Swiss Re company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle company and Swiss Re company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle company and Swiss Re company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle company and Swiss Re company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle company and Swiss Re company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle company and Swiss Re company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle company and Swiss Re company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle company and Swiss Re company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle company and Swiss Re company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle company and Swiss Re company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle and Swiss Re, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle and Swiss Re, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle or Swiss Re ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle or Swiss Re ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle and Swiss Re, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle and Swiss Re, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66339
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. After a CONNECT tunnel is established through an HTTP proxy, libsoup incorrectly attaches the Proxy-Authorization header to subsequent HTTPS requests sent through that tunnel to the destination server. This allows the destination server to capture proxy credentials, leading to information disclosure.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66338
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. The chunked transfer encoding parser uses a permissive parsing function for chunk sizes that silently accepts inputs violating RFC 9112, including leading whitespace, plus sign prefixes, and trailing invalid characters. When libsoup operates behind a strict frontend proxy, this parsing differential can be exploited to smuggle HTTP requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-66337
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. An unsigned integer underflow in the soup_filter_input_stream_read_until() function causes a heap buffer over-read when parsing multipart HTTP responses. A malicious HTTP server can exploit this by sending a crafted multipart response, potentially causing the client application to crash or disclose sensitive heap memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-61892
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI allows a non-privileged user to modify tokens to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-61886
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI stores user account passwords in plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8