Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāleCompensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle
VS
Suncorp GroupSuncorp Group
Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle

Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle

Vienības gatve 87H, Rīga, undefined, LV-1004, LV

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.compensa.lv
751/1000Fair

Esam uzņēmums, kas vienmēr domā ilgtermiņā. Mūsu darbības pamatā ir godīgums un atklātība attiecībā pret katru sadarbības partneri un klientu. Compensa īpašnieka Vienna Insurance Group teju divsimt gadu ilgā pieredze apdrošināšanas tirgū ir pierādījums, ka ar savu attie...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:64
Subsidiaries:40
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Suncorp Group

Suncorp Group

80 Ann St, Brisbane, 4000, AU

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://suncorpgroup.com.au
783/1000Fair

Suncorp offers insurance products and services through some of Australia and New Zealand’s most recognised brands. Our purpose is to build futures and protect what matters – the focus of our company for more than 100 years. With the passion of our people, and our por...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:13,401
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle

Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Suncorp Group

Suncorp Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Suncorp Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Suncorp Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Suncorp Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle

Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Suncorp Group

Suncorp Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle company and Suncorp Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle company and Suncorp Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle company and Suncorp Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle company and Suncorp Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle company and Suncorp Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle company and Suncorp Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle company and Suncorp Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle company and Suncorp Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle company and Suncorp Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle company and Suncorp Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle company and Suncorp Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle and Suncorp Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle and Suncorp Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle or Suncorp Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle or Suncorp Group ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle and Suncorp Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Compensa Vienna Insurance Group ADB Latvijas filiāle and Suncorp Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9044
SUMMARY

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the VPN module of TP-Link AXE75 V1 routers. This vulnerability allows an adjacent, authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device by importing a specially crafted VPN client configuration file. The issue arises from improper filtering of special characters.  Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may enable an attacker to gain full control of the affected device, potentially compromising configuration integrity, network security, and service availability.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-54909
SUMMARY

pion/stun is a Go implementation of STUN. Prior to 3.1.3, XORMappedAddress.GetFromAs can panic while parsing a malformed short XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS attribute in STUN or ICE Binding-response parsing paths, allowing remote denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54785
SUMMARY

gemini-bridge is a lightweight MCP server bridging AI agents to Google's Gemini AI via the official CLI. From 1.0.0 until 1.3.1, consult_gemini_with_files in inline mode read any file path supplied in the files argument without confining it to the working directory, then forwarded the contents to the Gemini CLI. Because the caller also controls query, the file contents are echoed back through the Gemini round-trip (and sent to Google), making this an arbitrary local file read. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-54768
SUMMARY

WPGraphQL provides a GraphQL API for WordPress sites. From 2.0.0 until 2.15.1, the deprecated user field on SendPasswordResetEmailPayload lets an unauthenticated caller distinguish existing author-class accounts through the sendPasswordResetEmail mutation and obtain public profile fields. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-53573
SUMMARY

GeoNetwork is a catalog application to manage spatially referenced resources. From 3.12.0 until 4.2.16 and 4.4.11, unsafe redirect validation in GeonetworkOAuth2LoginAuthenticationFilter and KeycloakAuthenticationProcessingFilter permits an attacker-controlled external redirect after login. This issue is fixed in versions 4.2.16 and 4.4.11.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA