Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Cervecera de CanariasCervecera de Canarias
VS
Levy RestaurantsLevy Restaurants
Cervecera de Canarias

Cervecera de Canarias

Calle Mali, 7, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Canary Islands, 38320, ES

Last Update: 29/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ccc.es
756/1000Fair

El año 1994 fue el año de la gran fusión. Compañía Cervecera de Canarias y Sical unen sus fuerzas manteniendo el nombre de la primera y formando uno de los mayores motores económicos que ha tenido el archipiélago: la Compañía Cervecera de Canarias, S.A. Desde entonces, ...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:252
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Levy Restaurants

Levy Restaurants

980 N Michigan Ave, Chicago, 60611, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
775/1000Fair

Discover the Levy Difference Passion is a great gift, and we have a lot of gifted people. Our contagious enthusiasm stimulates minds, engages senses and touches hearts. Each guest is greeted with a warm welcome, served with pride and extended a heartfelt invitation t...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:11,651
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cervecera de Canarias

Cervecera de Canarias

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Levy Restaurants

Levy Restaurants

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food & Beverages Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cervecera de Canarias in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food & Beverages Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Levy Restaurants in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Cervecera de Canarias (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cervecera de Canarias cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Levy Restaurants (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Levy Restaurants cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cervecera de Canarias

Cervecera de Canarias

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Levy Restaurants

Levy Restaurants

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Cervecera de Canarias company and Levy Restaurants company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cervecera de Canarias company and Levy Restaurants company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cervecera de Canarias company and Levy Restaurants company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cervecera de Canarias company and Levy Restaurants company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cervecera de Canarias company and Levy Restaurants company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cervecera de Canarias company and Levy Restaurants company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cervecera de Canarias company and Levy Restaurants company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cervecera de Canarias company and Levy Restaurants company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cervecera de Canarias company and Levy Restaurants company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cervecera de Canarias company and Levy Restaurants company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cervecera de Canarias company and Levy Restaurants company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cervecera de Canarias and Levy Restaurants, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cervecera de Canarias and Levy Restaurants, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cervecera de Canarias or Levy Restaurants ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cervecera de Canarias or Levy Restaurants ?
Between Cervecera de Canarias and Levy Restaurants, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cervecera de Canarias and Levy Restaurants, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2