Comparison Overview
COMO Shambhala (part of the COMO Group)

COMO Shambhala (part of the COMO Group)
6B Orange Grove Road, Singapore, Singapore, 258332, SG
Last Update: 30/03/2026
Committed to inspiring lifelong wellness in ourselves and in our guests, COMO Shambhala was conceived in 1997 by owner Mrs Christina Ong who believed that a healthful lifestyle had to be developed by each individual through awareness, practice and inspiration. Initiall...

Smart Fit
Avenida Paulista 1294, São Paulo, BR
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Somos o Grupo Smart Fit, a força que ativa o seu potencial. Um ecossistema em constante evolução que une tecnologia, propósito e performance para transformar o fitness, e a vida das pessoas, em movimento real. Com mais de 22 mil colaboradores e colaboradoras em 16 país...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

COMO Shambhala (part of the COMO Group)







Smart Fit






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for COMO Shambhala (part of the COMO Group) in 2026.
Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Smart Fit in 2026.
Incident History - COMO Shambhala (part of the COMO Group) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
COMO Shambhala (part of the COMO Group) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Smart Fit (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Smart Fit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

COMO Shambhala (part of the COMO Group)

Smart Fit
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.