Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

COMO Point Yamu, PhuketCOMO Point Yamu, Phuket
VS
IHG Hotels & ResortsIHG Hotels & Resorts
COMO Point Yamu, Phuket

COMO Point Yamu, Phuket

225 Moo 7, Paklok, Talang, Phuket 83110, TH

Last Update: 01/11/2025

View Profile

Our Phuket resort, with some of COMO's most striking pool villas, sits on the tip of Cape Yamu, giving magnificent views of Phang Nga Bay. The playful interiors are by Paola Navone — a tour-de-force in modern, location-sensitive design on an island imbued with a rich Th...

NAICS:721
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
IHG Hotels & Resorts

IHG Hotels & Resorts

Windsor Dials 1, Arthur Road, Windsor, Berkshire, GB, SL4 1RS

Last Update: 25/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ihgplc.com
777/1000Fair

IHG Hotels & Resorts [LON:IHG, NYSE:IHG (ADRs)] is a global hospitality company, with a purpose to provide True Hospitality for Good. With a family of 21 hotel brands and IHG One Rewards, one of the world's largest hotel loyalty programmes with over 160 million members...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:19,448
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
COMO Point Yamu, Phuket

COMO Point Yamu, Phuket

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
IHG Hotels & Resorts

IHG Hotels & Resorts

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for COMO Point Yamu, Phuket in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IHG Hotels & Resorts in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - COMO Point Yamu, Phuket (X = Date, Y = Severity)

COMO Point Yamu, Phuket cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - IHG Hotels & Resorts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IHG Hotels & Resorts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
COMO Point Yamu, Phuket

COMO Point Yamu, Phuket

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
IHG Hotels & Resorts

IHG Hotels & Resorts

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
IHG223521922
🔒 Incident : Breach
IHGHCLGAPWYNMCDVODKYNMIC1786975327
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
IHG1056072825

FAQ

Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket company and IHG Hotels & Resorts company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket company and IHG Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket company and IHG Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket company and IHG Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket company and IHG Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket company and IHG Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket company and IHG Hotels & Resorts company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket company and IHG Hotels & Resorts company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket company and IHG Hotels & Resorts company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket company and IHG Hotels & Resorts company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket company and IHG Hotels & Resorts company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket and IHG Hotels & Resorts, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket and IHG Hotels & Resorts, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - COMO Point Yamu, Phuket or IHG Hotels & Resorts ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - COMO Point Yamu, Phuket or IHG Hotels & Resorts ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket and IHG Hotels & Resorts, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between COMO Point Yamu, Phuket and IHG Hotels & Resorts, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89322
SUMMARY

Vault and Vault Enterprise did not consistently evaluate ACL policies against the canonical form of resource and policy names. This may allow an authenticated user with delegated permissions to bypass an explicit deny restriction and access a protected resource or assign a denied policy, potentially leading to privilege escalation. This vulnerability (CVE-2026-89322) is fixed in Vault Community Edition 2.1.2, and Vault Enterprise 2.1.2, 1.21.12, 1.20.17, and 1.19.23.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-107314
SUMMARY

pgjdbc, the PostgreSQL JDBC Driver, versions 42.7.11 through 42.7.13 enforce no restriction when the requireAuth connection property excludes all six authentication methods the driver knows, for example requireAuth=!password,!md5,!gss,!sspi,!scram-sha-256,!none. The driver then accepts any method the server asks for, including cleartext password authentication. A value without a method in it, such as requireAuth=, (a single comma), is affected the same way. An attacker positioned between the application and its server can ask for cleartext password authentication and receive the database password. A positive list such as requireAuth=scram-sha-256, and a partial exclusion such as requireAuth=!password,!md5, are enforced correctly. The property has no default value, so a deployment that does not set it is not affected. 42.7.14 fixes the problem: such a connection is refused with SQLState 08004, and a value without a method in it is rejected as invalid.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107285
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, a proxied ws request is carried through CONNECT, but NettyRequestFactory.newNettyRequest and requestUri decide whether to attach proxy authentication and an absolute-form target only from whether the URI is secure. Because ws is not marked secure, the tunneled WebSocket upgrade sent to the origin includes the proxy's Proxy-Authorization value. Basic credentials are directly recoverable and Digest responses can be replayed or cracked offline. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107284
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, WebSocketHandler.upgrade aborts a handshake whose Sec-WebSocket-Accept value is missing or invalid but continues into pipeline installation and onOpen delivery. Frames coalesced with the invalid 101 response can be decoded and delivered from a peer that did not prove the handshake, although the request future fails and the channel closes. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107283
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, Realm.Builder generates the HTTP Digest client nonce with ThreadLocalRandom rather than a cryptographically secure random source. Digest relies on an unpredictable cnonce to resist chosen-plaintext and credential precomputation attacks, so an observer able to infer generator state can reduce the protection of the authentication exchange. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
Como-point-yamu-phuket vs Ihghotels&resorts - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating | Rankiteo