Comparison Overview
COMO Hotels and Resorts
COMO Hotels and Resorts
COMO House, Singapore, Singapore, 258332, SG
Last Update: 01/06/2026
COMO Hotels and Resorts is committed to creating extraordinary experiences for curious people with a passion for a life lived fully. Our properties, from Bhutan to London, draw their inspiration from compelling locations. To this we bring the expertise for nurturing min...
Meliá Hotels International
C/Gremi Boters 24, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, Palma de Mallorca, Illes Balears, ES, 07009
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Welcome to Meliá Hotels International! From Mallorca to the world, our story is an exciting journey that began more than six decades ago and has led us to become one of the largest hotel chains on the planet and the most sustainable in Europe (S&P Global). With more t...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
COMO Hotels and Resorts
Meliá Hotels International
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for COMO Hotels and Resorts in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Meliá Hotels International in 2026.
Incident History - COMO Hotels and Resorts (X = Date, Y = Severity)
COMO Hotels and Resorts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Meliá Hotels International (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Meliá Hotels International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
COMO Hotels and Resorts
Meliá Hotels International
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.
Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.