Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Communication Valley ReplyCommunication Valley Reply
VS
CrowdStrikeCrowdStrike
Communication Valley Reply

Communication Valley Reply

Via Robert Koch 1/4 , Milano, 20152, IT

Last Update: 20/12/2025

View Profile
751/1000Fair

Communication Valley Reply, società del gruppo Reply, dal 2008 è specializzata nell’erogazione di Servizi Gestiti. I presidi Cyber Defence Center, IoT Security Center e Network Operation Center, certificati ISO27001, sono attivi 24x7, 365 giorni l’anno e affrontano qu...

NAICS:541514
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:130
Subsidiaries:119
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
CrowdStrike

CrowdStrike

Remote, US

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.crowdstrike.com
623/1000Poor

CrowdStrike (Nasdaq: CRWD), a global cybersecurity leader, has redefined modern security with the world’s most advanced cloud-native platform for protecting critical areas of enterprise risk — endpoints and cloud workloads, identity and data. Powered by the CrowdStrike...

NAICS:541514
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:11,601
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
8
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Communication Valley Reply

Communication Valley Reply

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
CrowdStrike

CrowdStrike

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Communication Valley Reply in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Avg (This Year)

CrowdStrike has 684.31% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Communication Valley Reply (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Communication Valley Reply cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CrowdStrike (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CrowdStrike cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Communication Valley Reply

Communication Valley Reply

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
CrowdStrike

CrowdStrike

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ADO1788668623
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CRO1788416624
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MICSENKASESECRO1782073479

FAQ

Between Communication Valley Reply company and CrowdStrike company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Communication Valley Reply company and CrowdStrike company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Communication Valley Reply company and CrowdStrike company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Communication Valley Reply company and CrowdStrike company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Communication Valley Reply company and CrowdStrike company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Communication Valley Reply company and CrowdStrike company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Communication Valley Reply company and CrowdStrike company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Communication Valley Reply company and CrowdStrike company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Communication Valley Reply company and CrowdStrike company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Communication Valley Reply company and CrowdStrike company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Communication Valley Reply company and CrowdStrike company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Communication Valley Reply and CrowdStrike, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Communication Valley Reply and CrowdStrike, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Communication Valley Reply or CrowdStrike ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Communication Valley Reply or CrowdStrike ?
Between Communication Valley Reply and CrowdStrike, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Communication Valley Reply and CrowdStrike, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9