CGC A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
CGC
Company Information
Website:http://commongoodcyber.org
Employees number:None
Number of followers:1,774
NAICS:92812
Industry Type:International Affairs
Homepage:commongoodcyber.org
CGC Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 750 and 799
CGCInternational Affairs
Updated:
07/04/2026
07/04/2026
750/1000
Fair
Baa
CGC Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
CGCInternational Affairs
Score locked

CGCFair
Current Score
750Baa (FAIR)
01000
1 incidents
-1 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
751
MAY 2026
751
APRIL 2026
751
Vulnerability
01 Apr 2026 • CGC
Common Unix Printing System: Critical CUPS Vulnerability Chain Allows Remote Code Execution as Root
Critical CUPS Vulnerabilities Expose Linux and Unix Systems to Remote Takeover
750
CRITICAL-1
COM1775572258
Critical CUPS Vulnerabilities Expose Linux and Unix Systems to Remote Takeover
A team of AI-driven vulnerability researchers, led by security expert Asim Viladi Oglu Manizada, has identified two severe flaws in the Common Unix Printing System (CUPS), a widely used print management component in Linux and Unix-like operating systems. When exploited in sequence, these vulnerabilities allow remote attackers to execute malicious code and escalate privileges to root-level access, granting full control over affected systems.
The first flaw, CVE-2026-34980, enables remote code execution (RCE) on systems with exposed, unauthenticated PostScript print queues. CUPS, which runs with elevated privileges, processes print job attributes without proper input sanitization. Attackers can inject a newline character into a print option, bypassing security checks and manipulating queue settings to execute arbitrary commands under the CUPS service account. This provides an initial foothold on the system.
The second vulnerability, CVE-2026-34990, allows local privilege escalation to root in default CUPS configurations. A low-privileged user can create a fake printer, intercept CUPS validation requests, and extract a privileged administrative token. By exploiting a race condition, the attacker can then overwrite protected system files, achieving full system compromise.
Combined, these flaws create a high-risk attack chain: an unauthenticated remote attacker can first gain code execution via CVE-2026-34980, then escalate to root access using CVE-2026-34990. As of early April 2026, fixes have been committed but official patched releases are not yet available. Enterprises and server environments relying on CUPS are advised to mitigate exposure by restricting network access, enforcing authentication for shared queues, and deploying security frameworks like AppArmor or SELinux to limit file system access.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
IMPACT
REFERENCES
MARCH 2026
751
FEBRUARY 2026
751
JANUARY 2026
751
DECEMBER 2025
751
NOVEMBER 2025
751
OCTOBER 2025
751
SEPTEMBER 2025
751
AUGUST 2025
751
JULY 2025
751
Frequently Asked Questions
?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for CGC ??
What was CGC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ??
What was CGC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ??
What was CGC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ??
What was CGC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ??
What was CGC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ??
What was CGC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ??
What was CGC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ??
What was CGC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ??
What was CGC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ??
What was CGC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ??
What was CGC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ??
What is the average per-incident point impact on CGC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ??
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with CGC ??
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ??
Where can I view CGC's profile page on Rankiteo ??
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?