Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materialscomfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials
VS
Mohawk IndustriesMohawk Industries
comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials

comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials

N/A

Last Update: 12/12/2025

View Profile
755/1000Fair

comfortemp® is a brand by the company Freudenberg Performance Materials. We believe that comfort and performance should never compromise style. As a trusted insulation partner to the world’s leading apparel brands, we empower designers to create outerwear that combines ...

NAICS:313
NAICS Definition:Textile Mills
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Mohawk Industries

Mohawk Industries

160 S Industrial Blvd, Calhoun, Georgia, US, 30701

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
775/1000Fair

Are you looking for more? At Mohawk Industries, we’re committed to more – more customer solutions, more process improvements, more sustainable manufacturing and more opportunities for our team. As a Fortune 500 global flooring leader with some of the best-known brands i...

NAICS:313
NAICS Definition:Textile Mills
Employees:12,780
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials

comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mohawk Industries

Mohawk Industries

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Textile Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Textile Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mohawk Industries in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials (X = Date, Y = Severity)

comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mohawk Industries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mohawk Industries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials

comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Mohawk Industries

Mohawk Industries

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials company and Mohawk Industries company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials company and Mohawk Industries company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials company and Mohawk Industries company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials company and Mohawk Industries company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials company and Mohawk Industries company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials company and Mohawk Industries company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials company and Mohawk Industries company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials company and Mohawk Industries company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials company and Mohawk Industries company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials company and Mohawk Industries company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials company and Mohawk Industries company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials and Mohawk Industries, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials and Mohawk Industries, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials or Mohawk Industries ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials or Mohawk Industries ?
Between comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials and Mohawk Industries, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials and Mohawk Industries, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA