Comparison Overview
comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials

comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials
N/A
Last Update: 12/12/2025
comfortemp® is a brand by the company Freudenberg Performance Materials. We believe that comfort and performance should never compromise style. As a trusted insulation partner to the world’s leading apparel brands, we empower designers to create outerwear that combines ...

Mohawk Industries
160 S Industrial Blvd, Calhoun, Georgia, US, 30701
Last Update: 30/03/2026
Are you looking for more? At Mohawk Industries, we’re committed to more – more customer solutions, more process improvements, more sustainable manufacturing and more opportunities for our team. As a Fortune 500 global flooring leader with some of the best-known brands i...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials







Mohawk Industries






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Textile Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials in 2026.
Incidents vs Textile Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Mohawk Industries in 2026.
Incident History - comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials (X = Date, Y = Severity)
comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Mohawk Industries (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mohawk Industries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

comfortemp by Freudenberg Performance Materials

Mohawk Industries
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.