Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLCCOMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC
VS
Vodafone Idea LimitedVodafone Idea Limited
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC

COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC

N/A

Last Update: 14/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://Www.comcast.com
510/1000Critical

COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC is a telecommunications company based out of 1701 JOHN F. KENNEDY BLVD, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:134
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1
Vodafone Idea Limited

Vodafone Idea Limited

Vodafone Idea Limited, Mumbai, 400030, IN

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.myvi.in/
767/1000Fair

Vodafone Idea Limited is an Aditya Birla Group and Vodafone Group partnership. It is India’s leading telecom service provider. The Company provides pan India Voice and Data services across 2G, 3G and 4G platform. With the large spectrum portfolio to support the growing ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:37,507
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC

COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Vodafone Idea Limited

Vodafone Idea Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vodafone Idea Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Vodafone Idea Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vodafone Idea Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC

COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
COM1764303965.747911
🔒 Incident : Breach
COM233072525
🔒 Incident : Breach
COM1776178473
Vodafone Idea Limited

Vodafone Idea Limited

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
VOD2875528102825

FAQ

Between COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC company and Vodafone Idea Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC company and Vodafone Idea Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC company and Vodafone Idea Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC company and Vodafone Idea Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC company and Vodafone Idea Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC company and Vodafone Idea Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC company and Vodafone Idea Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC company and Vodafone Idea Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC company and Vodafone Idea Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC company and Vodafone Idea Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC company and Vodafone Idea Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC and Vodafone Idea Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC and Vodafone Idea Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC or Vodafone Idea Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC or Vodafone Idea Limited ?
Between COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC and Vodafone Idea Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC and Vodafone Idea Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1