CBL A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
CBL
Company Information
Website:http://combatbrands.com/
Employees number:14
Number of followers:416
NAICS:33992
Industry Type:Sporting Goods Manufacturing
Homepage:combatbrands.com
CBL Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 750 and 799
CBLSporting Goods Manufacturing
Updated:
10/03/2026
10/03/2026
757/1000
Fair
Baa
CBL Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
CBLSporting Goods Manufacturing
Score locked

CBLFair
Current Score
757Baa (FAIR)
01000
1 incidents
0 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
AUGUST 2026
757
JULY 2026
757
JUNE 2026
757
MAY 2026
757
APRIL 2026
757
MARCH 2026
757
FEBRUARY 2026
757
JANUARY 2026
757
DECEMBER 2025
757
NOVEMBER 2025
757
OCTOBER 2025
757
SEPTEMBER 2025
757
JULY 2015
758
Cyber Attack
01 Jul 2015 • CBL
Combat Brands LLC
Combat Brands, LLC Data Breach (2015–2017)
727
HIGH-31
COM038090625
The Washington State Office of the Attorney General disclosed a data breach affecting Combat Brands, LLC, stemming from a cyberattack that persisted undetected between July 1, 2015, and October 6, 2017. The incident resulted in the compromise of payment card data for 956 individuals, including 753 Washington residents. Exposed information included cardholder names, card numbers, expiration dates, and CVV codes—critical details that could facilitate fraudulent transactions or identity theft. The breach highlights vulnerabilities in the company’s payment processing systems, allowing attackers prolonged access to sensitive financial data. While the exact method of infiltration (e.g., malware, phishing, or exploitation of unpatched systems) was not specified, the prolonged duration suggests a failure in detection mechanisms. The exposure of CVV codes—typically used for card-not-present transactions—increases the risk of unauthorized online purchases. Although no evidence of large-scale fraud was reported, the breach undermines customer trust and exposes the company to potential financial liabilities, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage. The incident underscores the need for robust payment security protocols, including encryption, tokenization, and real-time monitoring, to prevent similar compromises in the future.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
Frequently Asked Questions
?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for CBL ??
What was CBL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ??
What was CBL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ??
What was CBL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ??
What was CBL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ??
What was CBL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ??
What was CBL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ??
What was CBL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ??
What was CBL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ??
What was CBL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ??
What was CBL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ??
What was CBL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ??
What is the average per-incident point impact on CBL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ??
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with CBL ??
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ??
Where can I view CBL's profile page on Rankiteo ??
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?