Comparison Overview
Combat Brands LLC
Combat Brands LLC
15850 W. 108th Street, None, Lenexa, KS, US, 66219-1340
Last Update: 10/03/2026
Whether you're an amateur or professional fighter, a coach, or into combat sports for its fitness benefits, Ringside and Combat Sports International are the undisputed champion and have been for years. If you're in the fight game, you need the best gear available and tr...
New Balance
100 Guest St, Brighton Landing, Brighton, MA, US, 02135-2088
Last Update: 02/04/2026
In 1906, New Balance began as a humble one-man operation founded on the belief that “we were born to move,” and has since grown into an international corporation, selling footwear and apparel in over 120 countries and employing over 14,000 associates worldwide. Our miss...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Combat Brands LLC
New Balance
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Sporting Goods Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Combat Brands LLC in 2026.
Incidents vs Sporting Goods Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for New Balance in 2026.
Incident History - Combat Brands LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Combat Brands LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - New Balance (X = Date, Y = Severity)
New Balance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Combat Brands LLC
New Balance
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.