Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Combat Brands LLCCombat Brands LLC
VS
DECATHLON FRANCEDECATHLON FRANCE
Combat Brands LLC

Combat Brands LLC

15850 W. 108th Street, None, Lenexa, KS, US, 66219-1340

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://combatbrands.com/
757/1000Fair

Whether you're an amateur or professional fighter, a coach, or into combat sports for its fitness benefits, Ringside and Combat Sports International are the undisputed champion and have been for years. If you're in the fight game, you need the best gear available and tr...

NAICS:33992
NAICS Definition:Sporting and Athletic Goods Manufacturing
Employees:14
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
DECATHLON FRANCE

DECATHLON FRANCE

4, Boulevard de Mons, Villeneuve-d'Ascq, 59650, FR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
802/1000Good

We are the world's Largest sports retailer. Founded in 1976, in France, we have set about making the pleasure and benefit of sports available for everyone across the globe. We do that by providing world class products at extremely affordable prices for all participants,...

NAICS:33992
NAICS Definition:Sporting and Athletic Goods Manufacturing
Employees:25,684
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Combat Brands LLC

Combat Brands LLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DECATHLON FRANCE

DECATHLON FRANCE

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Combat Brands LLC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DECATHLON FRANCE in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Combat Brands LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Combat Brands LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DECATHLON FRANCE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DECATHLON FRANCE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Combat Brands LLC

Combat Brands LLC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
COM038090625
DECATHLON FRANCE

DECATHLON FRANCE

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Combat Brands LLC company and DECATHLON FRANCE company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Combat Brands LLC company and DECATHLON FRANCE company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Combat Brands LLC company and DECATHLON FRANCE company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Combat Brands LLC company and DECATHLON FRANCE company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Combat Brands LLC company and DECATHLON FRANCE company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Combat Brands LLC company and DECATHLON FRANCE company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Combat Brands LLC company and DECATHLON FRANCE company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Combat Brands LLC company and DECATHLON FRANCE company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Combat Brands LLC company and DECATHLON FRANCE company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Combat Brands LLC company and DECATHLON FRANCE company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Combat Brands LLC company and DECATHLON FRANCE company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Combat Brands LLC and DECATHLON FRANCE, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Combat Brands LLC and DECATHLON FRANCE, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Combat Brands LLC or DECATHLON FRANCE ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Combat Brands LLC or DECATHLON FRANCE ?
Between Combat Brands LLC and DECATHLON FRANCE, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Combat Brands LLC and DECATHLON FRANCE, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9