Comparison Overview

Columbus Museum of Art

VS

Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco

Columbus Museum of Art

480 East Broad Street, Columbus, 43215, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Columbus Museum of Art’s mission is to create great experiences with great art for everyone. Whether we are presenting an exhibition, designing an art-making activity, or giving visitors directions, we are guided by a vision to connect people and art. CMA nurtures that connection and removes barriers between our community and our collection. CMA’s galleries are filled with works that manifest creativity. Our collection includes outstanding late nineteenth and early twentieth-century American and European modern works of art. We house the world’s largest collections of works by beloved local artists Aminah Brenda Lynn Robinson, Elijah Pierce, and George Bellows; and acclaimed collections such as The Photo League and the Philip and Suzanne Schiller Collection of American Social Commentary Art. A commitment to contemporary art, folk art, glass, and photography continues the Museum’s dedication to showcasing art of our time. CMA is where creativity and the daily life of our community intersect and thrive, as we champion new and different ways of thinking and doing. We celebrate the creative process and provide opportunities for people to cultivate and discover the value of creativity in their own lives.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 197
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco

50 Hagiwara Tea Garden Drive, None, San Francisco, CA, US, 94118
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The Fine Arts Museums welcome more than 1.5 million visitors annually to enjoy an ambitious schedule of special exhibitions and education programs along with our world-class collection of 151,000 important artworks. Our staff is building on these successes to further expand the Museums’ reach with an exciting array of innovative and groundbreaking projects. Comprising the de Young Museum in Golden Gate Park and the Legion of Honor in Lincoln Park, the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco are together the largest public arts institution in the City of San Francisco, and one of the largest art museums in the United States.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 422
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/columbus-museum-of-art.jpeg
Columbus Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fine-arts-museums-of-san-francisco.jpeg
Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Columbus Museum of Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Columbus Museum of Art in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco in 2026.

Incident History — Columbus Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Columbus Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/columbus-museum-of-art.jpeg
Columbus Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fine-arts-museums-of-san-francisco.jpeg
Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Columbus Museum of Art company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Columbus Museum of Art company.

In the current year, Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco company and Columbus Museum of Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco company nor Columbus Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco company nor Columbus Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco company nor Columbus Museum of Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Columbus Museum of Art company nor Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Columbus Museum of Art nor Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Columbus Museum of Art company nor Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco company employs more people globally than Columbus Museum of Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Columbus Museum of Art nor Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Columbus Museum of Art nor Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Columbus Museum of Art nor Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Columbus Museum of Art nor Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Columbus Museum of Art nor Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Columbus Museum of Art nor Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H