Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Columbia University Information TechnologyColumbia University Information Technology
VS
Tech MahindraTech Mahindra
Columbia University Information Technology

Columbia University Information Technology

615 West 131st street, New York, 10027, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://cuit.columbia.edu/
666/1000Weak

Columbia University Information Technology (CUIT) supports mission critical technology for over 40,000 faculty, staff and students. CUIT provides Columbia University students, faculty and staff with central computing and communications services including email, telephon...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:64
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Tech Mahindra

Tech Mahindra

Erandwane, Pune, Maharashtra, IN, 411004

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.techmahindra.com
774/1000Fair

Tech Mahindra offers technology consulting and digital solutions to global enterprises across industries, enabling transformative scale at unparalleled speed. With 149k+ professionals across 90+ countries helping 1100+ clients, TechM provides a full spectrum of services...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:151,477
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Columbia University Information Technology

Columbia University Information Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tech Mahindra

Tech Mahindra

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Columbia University Information Technology in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tech Mahindra in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Columbia University Information Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Columbia University Information Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tech Mahindra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tech Mahindra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Columbia University Information Technology

Columbia University Information Technology

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
COL416070325
Tech Mahindra

Tech Mahindra

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
TEC172301022

FAQ

Between Columbia University Information Technology company and Tech Mahindra company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Columbia University Information Technology company and Tech Mahindra company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Columbia University Information Technology company and Tech Mahindra company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Columbia University Information Technology company and Tech Mahindra company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Columbia University Information Technology company and Tech Mahindra company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Columbia University Information Technology company and Tech Mahindra company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Columbia University Information Technology company and Tech Mahindra company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Columbia University Information Technology company and Tech Mahindra company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Columbia University Information Technology company and Tech Mahindra company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Columbia University Information Technology company and Tech Mahindra company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Columbia University Information Technology company and Tech Mahindra company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Columbia University Information Technology and Tech Mahindra, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Columbia University Information Technology and Tech Mahindra, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Columbia University Information Technology or Tech Mahindra ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Columbia University Information Technology or Tech Mahindra ?
Between Columbia University Information Technology and Tech Mahindra, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Columbia University Information Technology and Tech Mahindra, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1