Comparison Overview

Columbia River Maritime Museum

VS

Museum of Boulder

Columbia River Maritime Museum

None
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The Columbia River Maritime Museum has been sharing the Columbia River’s rich maritime heritage and history since 1962. The Museum’s wide-ranging exhibits, programs, collections and distinctive architecture express the vision of Founder Rolf Klep. The Museum is Oregon’s official state maritime museum, was the first Oregon museum to be nationally accredited, and is widely regarded as among the finest maritime museums in the United States.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Museum of Boulder

1206 Euclid Ave, Boulder, Colorado 80302, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

The Museum of Boulder is a cultural and arts institution that showcases the remarkable accomplishments of Boulder through innovative exhibits, programs and social engagement. The Museum collects, preserves and presents Boulder history in order to connect with the past, provide a context for the present and inspire a vision for the future.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/columbia-river-maritime-museum.jpeg
Columbia River Maritime Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boulder-history-museum.jpeg
Museum of Boulder
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Columbia River Maritime Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Museum of Boulder
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Columbia River Maritime Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of Boulder in 2026.

Incident History — Columbia River Maritime Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Columbia River Maritime Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Museum of Boulder (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of Boulder cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/columbia-river-maritime-museum.jpeg
Columbia River Maritime Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boulder-history-museum.jpeg
Museum of Boulder
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Museum of Boulder company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Columbia River Maritime Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Museum of Boulder company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Columbia River Maritime Museum company.

In the current year, Museum of Boulder company and Columbia River Maritime Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Museum of Boulder company nor Columbia River Maritime Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Museum of Boulder company nor Columbia River Maritime Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Museum of Boulder company nor Columbia River Maritime Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Columbia River Maritime Museum company nor Museum of Boulder company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Columbia River Maritime Museum nor Museum of Boulder holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Columbia River Maritime Museum company nor Museum of Boulder company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Museum of Boulder company employs more people globally than Columbia River Maritime Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Columbia River Maritime Museum nor Museum of Boulder holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Columbia River Maritime Museum nor Museum of Boulder holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Columbia River Maritime Museum nor Museum of Boulder holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Columbia River Maritime Museum nor Museum of Boulder holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Columbia River Maritime Museum nor Museum of Boulder holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Columbia River Maritime Museum nor Museum of Boulder holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H