Comparison Overview
Colorado State University

Colorado State University
102 Administration Building, Fort Collins, co, US, 80523-0100
Last Update: 02/04/2026
At Colorado State, there’s this energy we all share—this undeniable excitement for what’s next. And it’s a feeling you can only find here. As you choose a college, one of the biggest questions most students have is what to study. At Colorado State, we offer over 250 ...

University of Tehran
16 Azar Street, Enghlab Avenue, Tehran, 1417466191, IR
Last Update: 01/04/2026
University of Tehran, an iconic institution of higher education in Iran, traces its origins back seven centuries to its foundation as a houza (traditional religious school). Over time, it evolved from this religious structure into a modern academic institution. About a ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Colorado State University







University of Tehran






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Colorado State University in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for University of Tehran in 2026.
Incident History - Colorado State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Colorado State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - University of Tehran (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of Tehran cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Colorado State University

University of Tehran
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in ealpha072 Student-Management-System up to 01451bd7a2f58cdda07bd0b86e3967582e3ecd08. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file admin/config.php of the component Administrative Backend. Such manipulation leads to improper authentication. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A vulnerability was determined in sgl-project SGLang up to 0.5.11. Affected by this vulnerability is the function data_hash of the component Cache Handler. This manipulation causes denial of service. The attack is restricted to local execution. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.
Active IQ OneCollect version 2.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.
Active IQ Config Advisor version 6.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.
A vulnerability was found in crmeb crmeb_java 1.4. Affected is the function RestTemplate.getForEntity of the file crmeb-common/src/main/java/com/zbkj/common/utils/RestTemplateUtil.java of the component base64 Qrcode Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.