Comparison Overview
College of Fine Arts at The University of Texas at Austin
College of Fine Arts at The University of Texas at Austin
2301 Trinity St, Austin, 78712, US
Last Update: 27/12/2025
The College of Fine Arts is home to approximately 1,600 talented undergraduate students and about 400 graduate students. Together, our Butler School of Music, Department of Art and Art History, Department of Theatre and Dance and School of Design and Creative Technologi...
University of Louisville
2301 S 3rd St, Louisville, ky, US, 40292-0001
Last Update: 01/04/2026
The University of Louisville is a state supported research university located in Kentucky's largest metropolitan area. It was a municipally supported public institution for many decades prior to joining the university system in 1970. The University has three campuses. T...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
College of Fine Arts at The University of Texas at Austin
University of Louisville
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for College of Fine Arts at The University of Texas at Austin in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for University of Louisville in 2026.
Incident History - College of Fine Arts at The University of Texas at Austin (X = Date, Y = Severity)
College of Fine Arts at The University of Texas at Austin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - University of Louisville (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of Louisville cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
College of Fine Arts at The University of Texas at Austin
University of Louisville
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in ealpha072 Student-Management-System up to 01451bd7a2f58cdda07bd0b86e3967582e3ecd08. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file admin/config.php of the component Administrative Backend. Such manipulation leads to improper authentication. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A vulnerability was determined in sgl-project SGLang up to 0.5.11. Affected by this vulnerability is the function data_hash of the component Cache Handler. This manipulation causes denial of service. The attack is restricted to local execution. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.
Active IQ OneCollect version 2.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.
Active IQ Config Advisor version 6.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.
A vulnerability was found in crmeb crmeb_java 1.4. Affected is the function RestTemplate.getForEntity of the file crmeb-common/src/main/java/com/zbkj/common/utils/RestTemplateUtil.java of the component base64 Qrcode Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.