Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Coles LiquorColes Liquor
VS
Sally BeautySally Beauty
Coles Liquor

Coles Liquor

800 Toorak Rd, Hawthorn East, Victoria 3123, AU

Last Update: 23/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://colescareers.com.au/
772/1000Fair

Coles Liquor is a trusted retailer with three iconic trading banners, Liquorland, First Choice Liquor Market and Vintage Cellars. Our purpose is to help adult Australians lead happier and healthier lives by drinking in a responsible and sustainable way. As a drinks sp...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Sally Beauty

Sally Beauty

3001 Colorado Blvd., Denton, 76210, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sallybeauty.com
784/1000Fair

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. (“Sally”) through its affiliates is the world’s largest distributor of professional beauty supplies. Sally provides the channels that allow manufacturers of beauty supplies to reach customers, both professional and non-professional. Sall...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:11,932
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Coles Liquor

Coles Liquor

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sally Beauty

Sally Beauty

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coles Liquor in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sally Beauty in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Coles Liquor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coles Liquor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sally Beauty (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sally Beauty cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Coles Liquor

Coles Liquor

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Sally Beauty

Sally Beauty

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SAL224080425

FAQ

Between Coles Liquor company and Sally Beauty company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Coles Liquor company and Sally Beauty company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Coles Liquor company and Sally Beauty company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Coles Liquor company and Sally Beauty company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Coles Liquor company and Sally Beauty company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Coles Liquor company and Sally Beauty company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Coles Liquor company and Sally Beauty company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Coles Liquor company and Sally Beauty company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Coles Liquor company and Sally Beauty company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Coles Liquor company and Sally Beauty company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Coles Liquor company and Sally Beauty company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Coles Liquor and Sally Beauty, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Coles Liquor and Sally Beauty, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Coles Liquor or Sally Beauty ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Coles Liquor or Sally Beauty ?
Between Coles Liquor and Sally Beauty, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Coles Liquor and Sally Beauty, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1