Comparison Overview

Coinmama

VS

Allianz

Coinmama

Ontario, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Coinmama believes that the future of money is open source, decentralized and borderless. We believe that economic freedom and financial services should be available to every human being. It's why our mission is to simplify the way the world does cryptocurrency, and why we work to make crypto easy, friendly, and safe for our growing community of 2 million users around the world. We're here to serve you in this financial revolution. For more information, visit our company site at www.coinmama.com

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Allianz

Koeniginstrasse 28, Munich, undefined, 80802, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-01

The Allianz Group is one of the world's leading insurers and asset managers with more than 100 million private and corporate customers in more than 70 countries. We are proud to be the Worldwide Insurance Partner of the Olympic & Paralympic Movements from 2021 until 2028 and to be recognized as one of the industry leaders in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Caring for our employees, their ambitions, dreams and challenges is what makes us a unique employer. Together we can build an environment where everyone feels empowered and has the confidence to explore, to grow and to shape a better future for our customers and the world around us. Join us and together, let’s care for tomorrow. Credits: https://www.allianz.com/en_GB/credits-allianz-se.html Follow us on: Twitter: twitter.com/Allianz Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/teamallianz Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AllianzCareers Glassdoor: https://www.glassdoor.de/%C3%9Cberblick/Arbeit-bei-Allianz-EI_IE3062.11,18.htm Allianz Data Privacy Statement: https://www.allianz.com/en_GB/privacy-statement.html Allianz Careers Data Privacy Statement: https://careers.allianz.com/en_EN/footer/data-privacy.html LinkedIn Privacy Policy: https://www.linkedin.com/legal/privacy-policy LinkedIn General Terms: https://www.linkedin.com/legal/user-agreement

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 147,457
Subsidiaries: 126
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coinmama.jpeg
Coinmama
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allianz.jpeg
Allianz
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Coinmama
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Allianz
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coinmama in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allianz in 2025.

Incident History — Coinmama (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coinmama cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Allianz (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allianz cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coinmama.jpeg
Coinmama
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2017
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Multi-platform Hack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allianz.jpeg
Allianz
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party CRM compromise, Malware deployment (ransomware), Unauthorized access
Motivation: Data Theft, Financial Gain (likely)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Salesforce Instances, Data Exfiltration
Motivation: Financial Gain, Extortion, Data Theft for Resale or Fraud
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Third-party cloud-based CRM system
Motivation: Data theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Allianz company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Coinmama company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Allianz company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Coinmama company.

In the current year, Allianz company has reported more cyber incidents than Coinmama company.

Allianz company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Coinmama company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Allianz company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Coinmama company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Allianz company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Coinmama company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Coinmama company nor Allianz company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Coinmama nor Allianz holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Allianz company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Coinmama company.

Allianz company employs more people globally than Coinmama company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Coinmama nor Allianz holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Coinmama nor Allianz holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Coinmama nor Allianz holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Coinmama nor Allianz holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Coinmama nor Allianz holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Coinmama nor Allianz holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu: hide VRAM sysfs attributes on GPUs without VRAM Otherwise accessing them can cause a crash.

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu: Fix NULL pointer dereference in VRAM logic for APU devices Previously, APU platforms (and other scenarios with uninitialized VRAM managers) triggered a NULL pointer dereference in `ttm_resource_manager_usage()`. The root cause is not that the `struct ttm_resource_manager *man` pointer itself is NULL, but that `man->bdev` (the backing device pointer within the manager) remains uninitialized (NULL) on APUs—since APUs lack dedicated VRAM and do not fully set up VRAM manager structures. When `ttm_resource_manager_usage()` attempts to acquire `man->bdev->lru_lock`, it dereferences the NULL `man->bdev`, leading to a kernel OOPS. 1. **amdgpu_cs.c**: Extend the existing bandwidth control check in `amdgpu_cs_get_threshold_for_moves()` to include a check for `ttm_resource_manager_used()`. If the manager is not used (uninitialized `bdev`), return 0 for migration thresholds immediately—skipping VRAM-specific logic that would trigger the NULL dereference. 2. **amdgpu_kms.c**: Update the `AMDGPU_INFO_VRAM_USAGE` ioctl and memory info reporting to use a conditional: if the manager is used, return the real VRAM usage; otherwise, return 0. This avoids accessing `man->bdev` when it is NULL. 3. **amdgpu_virt.c**: Modify the vf2pf (virtual function to physical function) data write path. Use `ttm_resource_manager_used()` to check validity: if the manager is usable, calculate `fb_usage` from VRAM usage; otherwise, set `fb_usage` to 0 (APUs have no discrete framebuffer to report). This approach is more robust than APU-specific checks because it: - Works for all scenarios where the VRAM manager is uninitialized (not just APUs), - Aligns with TTM's design by using its native helper function, - Preserves correct behavior for discrete GPUs (which have fully initialized `man->bdev` and pass the `ttm_resource_manager_used()` check). v4: use ttm_resource_manager_used(&adev->mman.vram_mgr.manager) instead of checking the adev->gmc.is_app_apu flag (Christian)

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: exfat: fix improper check of dentry.stream.valid_size We found an infinite loop bug in the exFAT file system that can lead to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) condition. When a dentry in an exFAT filesystem is malformed, the following system calls — SYS_openat, SYS_ftruncate, and SYS_pwrite64 — can cause the kernel to hang. Root cause analysis shows that the size validation code in exfat_find() does not check whether dentry.stream.valid_size is negative. As a result, the system calls mentioned above can succeed and eventually trigger the DoS issue. This patch adds a check for negative dentry.stream.valid_size to prevent this vulnerability.

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb/server: fix possible memory leak in smb2_read() Memory leak occurs when ksmbd_vfs_read() fails. Fix this by adding the missing kvfree().

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb/server: fix possible refcount leak in smb2_sess_setup() Reference count of ksmbd_session will leak when session need reconnect. Fix this by adding the missing ksmbd_user_session_put().