Comparison Overview
Cognita Reply
Cognita Reply
Corso Francia, 110, Turin, 10143, IT
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Cognita Reply is the vertical startup within the Reply Group and OpenAI’s trusted partner in Europe, dedicated to bringing generative AI into our clients’ business processes — where transformation is measured through efficiency, innovation, and return on investment (ROI...
CGI
Worldwide, Worldwide, CA, 00
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Insights you can act on. Founded in 1976, CGI is among the largest IT and business consulting services firms in the world. We are insights-driven and outcomes-focused to help accelerate returns on your investments. Across hundreds of locations worldwide, we provide com...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Cognita Reply
CGI
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cognita Reply in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
CGI has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Cognita Reply (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cognita Reply cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - CGI (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CGI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Cognita Reply
CGI
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.