Comparison Overview
Cogeco Business

Cogeco Business
5, Place Ville Marie, Montréal, H3B 0B3, CA
Last Update: 13/11/2025
Cogeco, c’est un service 100 % local et un réseau propulsé par la fibre. Depuis plus de 65 ans, on est présent dans les petites villes du Québec et de l’Ontario, et cela vaut aussi pour nos employés. On vit dans les communautés qu’on dessert et la satisfaction de notre ...

Totalplay
Avenida San Jerónimo 252, Álvaro Obregón, 01090, MX
Last Update: 06/09/2026
Somos una empresa orgullosamente mexicana, líder en tecnología, telecomunicaciones y entretenimiento. Estamos siempre a la vanguardia con el objetivo de llevar a nuestros clientes lo mejor en conectividad, ya sea para que estén cerca de los que más quieren ó puedan alc...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Cogeco Business







Totalplay






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cogeco Business in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Totalplay in 2026.
Incident History - Cogeco Business (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cogeco Business cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Totalplay (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Totalplay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Cogeco Business

Totalplay
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.