Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Cofidis MagyarországCofidis Magyarország
VS
Old MutualOld Mutual
Cofidis Magyarország

Cofidis Magyarország

Váci road 96-98, Budapest, Budapest, HU, 1133

Last Update: 27/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cofidis.hu/
756/1000Fair

Üdvözlünk Cofidis Magyarországi Fióktelepe és a Magyar Cofidis Bank Zrt. közös oldalán. A Cofidis 2005 óta működik Magyarországon, a francia Credit Mutuel leányvállalataként, ami Európa egyik legbefolyásosabb bankja. A Cofidis 4000 munkatársával Európa nyolc országában...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:183
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Old Mutual

Old Mutual

107 Rivonia Rd, Johannesburg, ZA

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.oldmutual.com
767/1000Fair

Old Mutual Limited is a listed company on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange and has secondary listings on the London, Malawi, Namibia and Zimbabwe stock exchanges. As a Pan-African financial services company, we are focused on Africa, her needs and her people. Together w...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:12,932
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cofidis Magyarország

Cofidis Magyarország

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Old Mutual

Old Mutual

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cofidis Magyarország in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Old Mutual in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Cofidis Magyarország (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cofidis Magyarország cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Old Mutual (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Old Mutual cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cofidis Magyarország

Cofidis Magyarország

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Old Mutual

Old Mutual

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Cofidis Magyarország company and Old Mutual company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cofidis Magyarország company and Old Mutual company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cofidis Magyarország company and Old Mutual company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cofidis Magyarország company and Old Mutual company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cofidis Magyarország company and Old Mutual company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cofidis Magyarország company and Old Mutual company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cofidis Magyarország company and Old Mutual company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cofidis Magyarország company and Old Mutual company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cofidis Magyarország company and Old Mutual company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cofidis Magyarország company and Old Mutual company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cofidis Magyarország company and Old Mutual company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cofidis Magyarország and Old Mutual, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cofidis Magyarország and Old Mutual, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cofidis Magyarország or Old Mutual ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cofidis Magyarország or Old Mutual ?
Between Cofidis Magyarország and Old Mutual, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cofidis Magyarország and Old Mutual, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1