Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

COFEX MéditerranéeCOFEX Méditerranée
VS
AECOMAECOM
COFEX Méditerranée

COFEX Méditerranée

3, Rond-Point de l'aéropole - Zone Aéropôle, None, Garons, Gard, FR, 30128

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
753/1000Fair

COFEX Méditerranée, filiale de VINCI Construction, est une entreprise de génie civil spécialisé. Elle intervient principalement sur le territoire Occitanie et l'arc méditerranéen pour des clients publics et privés et réalise des travaux spéciaux tels que : - Réparation...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:35
Subsidiaries:124
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
AECOM

AECOM

13355 Noel Road, Suite 400, Dallas, Texas, US, 75240

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aecom.com
782/1000Fair

AECOM is the global infrastructure leader, committed to delivering a better world. As a trusted professional services firm powered by deep technical abilities, we solve our clients’ complex challenges in water, environment, energy, transportation and buildings. Our team...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:74,394
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
COFEX Méditerranée

COFEX Méditerranée

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AECOM

AECOM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for COFEX Méditerranée in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AECOM in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - COFEX Méditerranée (X = Date, Y = Severity)

COFEX Méditerranée cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AECOM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AECOM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
COFEX Méditerranée

COFEX Méditerranée

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
AECOM

AECOM

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AEC745072725

FAQ

Between COFEX Méditerranée company and AECOM company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between COFEX Méditerranée company and AECOM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between COFEX Méditerranée company and AECOM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between COFEX Méditerranée company and AECOM company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between COFEX Méditerranée company and AECOM company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between COFEX Méditerranée company and AECOM company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between COFEX Méditerranée company and AECOM company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between COFEX Méditerranée company and AECOM company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between COFEX Méditerranée company and AECOM company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between COFEX Méditerranée company and AECOM company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between COFEX Méditerranée company and AECOM company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between COFEX Méditerranée and AECOM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between COFEX Méditerranée and AECOM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - COFEX Méditerranée or AECOM ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - COFEX Méditerranée or AECOM ?
Between COFEX Méditerranée and AECOM, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between COFEX Méditerranée and AECOM, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1