Comparison Overview
CodeRabbit

CodeRabbit
San Francisco, California, US
Last Update: 11/07/2026
CodeRabbit is an innovative, AI-driven platform that transforms the way code reviews are done. It delivers context-aware, human-like reviews, improving code quality, reducing the time and effort required for thorough manual code reviews, and enabling teams to ship softw...

Lazada
51 Bras Basah Road, Singapore, Singapore, SG, 189554
Last Update: 19/06/2026
About Lazada Group Founded in 2012, Lazada Group is the leading eCommerce platform in Southeast Asia. We are accelerating progress in Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam through commerce and technology. With the largest logistics and ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

CodeRabbit







Lazada






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
CodeRabbit has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Lazada in 2026.
Incident History - CodeRabbit (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CodeRabbit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Lazada (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Lazada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

CodeRabbit

Lazada
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.