Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Codema ScaniaCodema Scania
VS
Total Quality LogisticsTotal Quality Logistics
Codema Scania

Codema Scania

Rodovia Presidente Dutra, Km 223,8, Guarulhos, 07034-907, BR

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.codema.com.br/
750/1000Fair

A melhor concessionária segundo a opinião dos caminhoneiros. Neste ano, a concessionária Codema completa 70 anos. No decorrer dessa trajetória, a casa sempre se manteve preocupada em preservar a filosofia da Scania, multiplicando seu DNA - com trabalho em equipe e ambie...

NAICS:484
NAICS Definition:Truck Transportation
Employees:239
Subsidiaries:66
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Total Quality Logistics

Total Quality Logistics

4289 Ivy Pointe Blvd, Cincinnati, Ohio, US, 45245

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

The logistics industry is a $500 billion market. With annual sales over $8 billion, Total Quality Logistics (TQL) is one of the largest freight brokerage firms in the nation. TQL connects customers with truckload freight that needs to be moved with quality carriers who ...

NAICS:484
NAICS Definition:Truck Transportation
Employees:16,969
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Codema Scania

Codema Scania

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Total Quality Logistics

Total Quality Logistics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Codema Scania in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Total Quality Logistics in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Codema Scania (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Codema Scania cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Total Quality Logistics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Total Quality Logistics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Codema Scania

Codema Scania

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Total Quality Logistics

Total Quality Logistics

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TOT532092125

FAQ

Between Codema Scania company and Total Quality Logistics company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Codema Scania company and Total Quality Logistics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Codema Scania company and Total Quality Logistics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Codema Scania company and Total Quality Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Codema Scania company and Total Quality Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Codema Scania company and Total Quality Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Codema Scania company and Total Quality Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Codema Scania company and Total Quality Logistics company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Codema Scania company and Total Quality Logistics company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Codema Scania company and Total Quality Logistics company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Codema Scania company and Total Quality Logistics company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Codema Scania and Total Quality Logistics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Codema Scania and Total Quality Logistics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Codema Scania or Total Quality Logistics ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Codema Scania or Total Quality Logistics ?
Between Codema Scania and Total Quality Logistics, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Codema Scania and Total Quality Logistics, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA