Comparison Overview

Coca-Cola Consolidated

VS

Frito-Lay

Coca-Cola Consolidated

4100 Coca-Cola Plaza, None, Charlotte, NC, US, 28211
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Coca-Cola Consolidated is the largest Coca-Cola bottler in the United States. Our Purpose is to honor God in all we do, serve others, pursue excellence, and grow profitably. For over 120 years, we have been deeply committed to the consumers, customers, and communities we serve and are passionate about the broad portfolio of beverages and services we offer. We make, sell, and distribute beverages of The Coca-Cola Company and other partner companies in more than 300 brands and flavors across 14 states and the District of Columbia to approximately 60 million consumers. Headquartered in Charlotte, N.C., Coca-Cola Consolidated is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “COKE.” More information about the Company is available at www.cokeconsolidated.com. Follow Coca-Cola Consolidated on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and LinkedIn.

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 14,248
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Frito-Lay

7701 Legacy Dr, Plano, Texas, US, 75024
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

We believe every consumer should have access to their favorite snack, everywhere. We own the manufacturing process from seed to shelf and actively invest in technology to automate key steps of the process. This helps us be more agile in what we need to make, who we need to make it for, and how we can best deliver it to snack lovers from coast to coast.

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 15,749
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cocacolaconsolidated.jpeg
Coca-Cola Consolidated
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/frito-lay.jpeg
Frito-Lay
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Coca-Cola Consolidated
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Frito-Lay
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coca-Cola Consolidated in 2025.

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Frito-Lay in 2025.

Incident History — Coca-Cola Consolidated (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coca-Cola Consolidated cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Frito-Lay (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Frito-Lay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cocacolaconsolidated.jpeg
Coca-Cola Consolidated
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/frito-lay.jpeg
Frito-Lay
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Coca-Cola Consolidated company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Frito-Lay company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Frito-Lay company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Coca-Cola Consolidated company.

In the current year, Frito-Lay company and Coca-Cola Consolidated company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Frito-Lay company nor Coca-Cola Consolidated company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Frito-Lay company nor Coca-Cola Consolidated company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Frito-Lay company nor Coca-Cola Consolidated company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Coca-Cola Consolidated company nor Frito-Lay company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Coca-Cola Consolidated nor Frito-Lay holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Frito-Lay company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Coca-Cola Consolidated company.

Frito-Lay company employs more people globally than Coca-Cola Consolidated company, reflecting its scale as a Food and Beverage Services.

Neither Coca-Cola Consolidated nor Frito-Lay holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Coca-Cola Consolidated nor Frito-Lay holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Coca-Cola Consolidated nor Frito-Lay holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Coca-Cola Consolidated nor Frito-Lay holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Coca-Cola Consolidated nor Frito-Lay holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Coca-Cola Consolidated nor Frito-Lay holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N