Comparison Overview
Coca-Cola FEMSA

Coca-Cola FEMSA
undefined, Ciudad de México, undefined, undefined, MX
Last Update: 29/03/2026
The public bottler with the largest volume of sales within the Coca-Cola System, committed with the generation of economic value and social and environmental well-being.

PRAN-RFL Group
PRAN-RFL Center, 105, Middle Badda, Dhaka, BD, 1212
Last Update: 01/04/2026
PRAN RFL Group, one of the most reputed conglomerates in Bangladesh, is in market since 1981. It started mainly with Foundry business and gradually diversified to Light Engineering, PVC Fittings, Plastics, Food and Beverage and Agro-Processing. It has it's marketing and...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Coca-Cola FEMSA







PRAN-RFL Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Coca-Cola FEMSA in 2026.
Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for PRAN-RFL Group in 2026.
Incident History - Coca-Cola FEMSA (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Coca-Cola FEMSA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - PRAN-RFL Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
PRAN-RFL Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Coca-Cola FEMSA

PRAN-RFL Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.