Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Coca-Cola Europacific PartnersCoca-Cola Europacific Partners
VS
Grendene S/AGrendene S/A
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners

Coca-Cola Europacific Partners

Baker's Road, Uxbridge, West London, GB, UB8 1EZ

Last Update: 08/03/2026

View Profile
744/1000Moderate

We make, move and sell the world's most loved drinks, through our great brands, great people, great execution and all done sustainably. Read our privacy policy here ⬇️

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:26,871
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Grendene S/A

Grendene S/A

Av. Pedro Grendene, 131. Bairro Volta Grande, Farroupilha, 95180-000, BR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.grendene.com.br/
786/1000Fair

Se você deseja construir uma carreira em uma das maiores empresas do Brasil, a Grendene é o seu lugar. Se você quer estar em uma empresa diferente, com criatividade brasileira, tecnologia global e inovação constante, faça parte da nossa equipe. Se você busca desen...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:11,184
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners

Coca-Cola Europacific Partners

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Grendene S/A

Grendene S/A

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coca-Cola Europacific Partners in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grendene S/A in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coca-Cola Europacific Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Grendene S/A (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grendene S/A cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners

Coca-Cola Europacific Partners

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
COC1770775171
Grendene S/A

Grendene S/A

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Coca-Cola Europacific Partners company and Grendene S/A company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Coca-Cola Europacific Partners company and Grendene S/A company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Coca-Cola Europacific Partners company and Grendene S/A company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Coca-Cola Europacific Partners company and Grendene S/A company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Coca-Cola Europacific Partners company and Grendene S/A company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Coca-Cola Europacific Partners company and Grendene S/A company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Coca-Cola Europacific Partners company and Grendene S/A company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Coca-Cola Europacific Partners company and Grendene S/A company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Coca-Cola Europacific Partners company and Grendene S/A company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Coca-Cola Europacific Partners company and Grendene S/A company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Coca-Cola Europacific Partners company and Grendene S/A company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Coca-Cola Europacific Partners and Grendene S/A, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Coca-Cola Europacific Partners and Grendene S/A, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Coca-Cola Europacific Partners or Grendene S/A ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Coca-Cola Europacific Partners or Grendene S/A ?
Between Coca-Cola Europacific Partners and Grendene S/A, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Coca-Cola Europacific Partners and Grendene S/A, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2