Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Coca-Cola Beverages ZambiaCoca-Cola Beverages Zambia
VS
Southern Glazer's Wine & SpiritsSouthern Glazer's Wine & Spirits
Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia

Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia

215 A Ndipo Road, None, Lusaka, None, ZM, None

Last Update: 25/10/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://ccbagroup.com
772/1000Fair

Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia is a subsidiary of Coca-Cola Beverages Africa (CCBA). CCBA bottles and distributes beverages trademarked by The Coca-Cola Company (TCCC) or TCCC’s affiliated entities and is the world’s 8th largest Coca-Cola bottler by revenue. CCBA has over 1...

NAICS:3121
NAICS Definition:Beverage Manufacturing
Employees:100
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits

Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits

Miami, None, Miami, Florida, US, 33169

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
801/1000Good

Southern Glazer’s Wine & Spirits is the world’s pre-eminent distributor of beverage alcohol, and proud to be a multi-generational, family-owned company. We have operations in 47 states and Canada. We offer an array of careers focused on delivering a captivating and rewa...

NAICS:3121
NAICS Definition:Beverage Manufacturing
Employees:16,829
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia

Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits

Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia

Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits

Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia or Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia or Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits ?
Between Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Coca-Cola Beverages Zambia and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1