Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

COBRA PUMA GOLFCOBRA PUMA GOLF
VS
DecathlonDecathlon
COBRA PUMA GOLF

COBRA PUMA GOLF

1818 Aston Avenue, None, Carlsbad, CA, US, 92008

Last Update: 22/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
cobragolf.com
762/1000Fair

COBRA PUMA GOLF is a leading golf brand that designs and develops superior-quality golf equipment as well as stylish, high-performance golf apparel, footwear and accessories. COBRA Golf was founded in 1973 and has a history of bringing innovative and high quality golf...

NAICS:33992
NAICS Definition:Sporting and Athletic Goods Manufacturing
Employees:428
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Decathlon

Decathlon

Villeneuve-d'Ascq, LILLE, FR, 59650

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
816/1000Good

We are Decathlon. We are sport. And we believe that sport brings out the best in people, especially those in teams. Our teammates are as passionate about people as they are about sport. Our values guide our daily actions: Vitality, Generosity, Responsibility, and Au...

NAICS:33992
NAICS Definition:Sporting and Athletic Goods Manufacturing
Employees:37,105
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
COBRA PUMA GOLF

COBRA PUMA GOLF

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Decathlon

Decathlon

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for COBRA PUMA GOLF in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Decathlon in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - COBRA PUMA GOLF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

COBRA PUMA GOLF cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Decathlon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Decathlon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
COBRA PUMA GOLF

COBRA PUMA GOLF

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Decathlon

Decathlon

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between COBRA PUMA GOLF company and Decathlon company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between COBRA PUMA GOLF company and Decathlon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between COBRA PUMA GOLF company and Decathlon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between COBRA PUMA GOLF company and Decathlon company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between COBRA PUMA GOLF company and Decathlon company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between COBRA PUMA GOLF company and Decathlon company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between COBRA PUMA GOLF company and Decathlon company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between COBRA PUMA GOLF company and Decathlon company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between COBRA PUMA GOLF company and Decathlon company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between COBRA PUMA GOLF company and Decathlon company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between COBRA PUMA GOLF company and Decathlon company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between COBRA PUMA GOLF and Decathlon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between COBRA PUMA GOLF and Decathlon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - COBRA PUMA GOLF or Decathlon ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - COBRA PUMA GOLF or Decathlon ?
Between COBRA PUMA GOLF and Decathlon, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between COBRA PUMA GOLF and Decathlon, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-48777
SUMMARY

FileBrowser Quantum is a free, self-hosted, web-based file manager. Versions prior to 1.3.2-stable, 1.4.0-beta and 1.4.1-beta are vulnerable to Path Traversal through the publicPatchHandler in backend/http/public.go which joins user-controlled fromPath and toPath body fields with the trusted d.share.Path BEFORE the downstream sanitizer runs. Because filepath.Join collapses .. segments during the join, the sanitizer in resourcePatchHandler never sees the traversal and the move/copy/rename operates on a path outside the shared directory. The same root-cause pattern was patched for the bulk DELETE endpoint as CVE-2026-44542 (GHSA-fwj3-42wh-8673), but the PATCH handler with the identical pattern was not updated. A public share link with AllowModify=true is sufficient to exploit this. Anyone holding such a link can move, copy, or rename arbitrary files within the share owner's source root. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.3.3-stable and 1.4.2-beta.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47750
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the GLOBAL opcode handler. The issue was caused by missing validation when searching for newline-delimited fields. A crafted .ckpt file without the expected newline could cause the parser to use -1 as a copy length, resulting in immediate heap corruption. The attack requires the victim or application to load a .ckpt file from an untrusted source, such as a downloaded model from a model sharing site. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by following these instructions: do not load .ckpt checkpoint files from untrusted sources, and prefer trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-47747
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the BINUNICODE opcode handler. The issue was caused by sign confusion on the opcode length field. A crafted .ckpt file could trigger memcpy with a very large length derived from a negative signed value, causing immediate heap corruption. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by only loading .ckpt checkpoint files from trusted sources and preferring trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-46448
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Nova before 33.0.2, the server create API does not strip certain hint data. The resulting instance has no Placement allocation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-22313
SUMMARY

The device has a webserver that exposes a REST API authenticated with a token on the management network. By exploiting an OS command injection vulnerability an authenticated attacker can send arbitrary commands to the device that are executed with administrative permissions by the underlying operating system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3