Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Coastal Automotive, LLC

Coastal Automotive, LLC Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

coastal-automotive.com

Coastal Automotive, LLC is a dynamic solutions provider which specializes in the design and fabrication of energy absorbing (EA) materials for the automotive, motorsports, and packaging industries. Formed in 2007 to manufacture and distribute Dow Automotive energy absorbing materials. In 2010, Dow Automotive and Coastal Automotive expanded their agreement by designating Coastal as the “exclusive” provider of Dow Automotive energy absorbing materials Coastal Automotive strives to be the best, low cost / high quality supplier. Providing high performance materials through efficient design, lean manufacturing, and on time delivery with zero defects. Awards 2013 Honored as GM Supplier of the Year 2016 Michigan 50 Companies to Watch 2016


CAL A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

CAL
Company Information
Website:http://www.coastal-automotive.com
Employees number:73
Number of followers:1,421
NAICS:
Industry Type:Automotive
Homepage:coastal-automotive.com
CAL Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
logo
CALAutomotive
Updated:
02/04/2026
741/1000
Moderate
Ba
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
CAL Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
CALAutomotive
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

CAL
CALModerate
Current Score
741Ba (MODERATE)
01000
1 incidents
-14 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JULY 2026
743Before Incident
JUNE 2026
743Before Incident
MAY 2026
742Before Incident
APRIL 2026
741Before Incident
MARCH 2026
741Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
740Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
754Before Incident
Vulnerability
25 Jan 2026CAL
Alpitronic and Automotive Grade Linux: Automotive systems get pwned at Pwn2Own Automotive 2026

Cybersecurity Roundup: Zero-Days, Privacy Fines, AI Vulnerabilities, and Exposed Criminal Data

740After Incident
CRITICAL-14
ALPCOA1769923964
Cybersecurity Roundup: Zero-Days, Privacy Fines, AI Vulnerabilities, and Exposed Criminal Data The past week brought significant developments in cybersecurity, from high-profile vulnerability discoveries to regulatory actions and AI-related risks. Pwn2Own Automotive Uncovers 76 Zero-Days in EV Systems The third annual Pwn2Own Automotive competition in Tokyo exposed 76 unique zero-day vulnerabilities across automotive software, including Tesla infotainment systems and EV chargers. A record 73 entries competed, with Trend Micro’s Zero Day Initiative awarding over $1 million in prizes. The winning team, Fuzzware.io, earned $215,500 and the Master of Pwn title after exploiting an out-of-bounds write flaw in the Alpitronic HYC50 EV charger. Other notable exploits included a Time-of-Check to Time-of-Use vulnerability in the same charger used to install Doom and a full takeover of Tesla’s infotainment system by Synacktiv. Automotive Grade Linux was also compromised via three separate flaws. France Fines Unnamed Company €3.5M for GDPR Violations French regulators imposed a €3.5 million fine on an undisclosed company for sharing customer loyalty data including email addresses and phone numbers with a social network for targeted advertising without explicit consent. The violations, spanning from February 2018 to December 2023, affected over 10.5 million Europeans across 16 countries. The National Commission on Informatics and Liberty cited breaches of both GDPR and France’s Data Protection Act but opted not to name the company, citing proportionality. Google Gemini Vulnerability Exposed Calendar Data via Prompt Injection Security firm Miggo identified a flaw in Google’s Gemini AI that could leak users’ private calendar details through malicious event invitations. By embedding a hidden prompt-injection payload in an event description, attackers could trick Gemini into summarizing confidential meetings into a new calendar entry potentially visible to the attacker in enterprise setups. Google patched the issue, but Miggo warned that AI systems introduce novel attack surfaces requiring dedicated security controls. HackerOne Introduces Safe Harbor for AI Security Research Bug bounty platform HackerOne released a Good Faith AI Research Safe Harbor framework to clarify rules for ethical AI testing. The guidelines protect researchers from legal action if they follow conditions such as avoiding data exfiltration, unnecessary damage, or competitive reverse-engineering. Organizations adopting the agreement commit to treating authorized AI research as legitimate, addressing ambiguity in traditional vulnerability disclosure models. Cybercriminals’ Exposed Credential Database Highlights Persistent Risks Researcher Jeremiah Fowler discovered a 96GB database containing 149 million unique login credentials including social media, banking, and government accounts left publicly accessible online. The data, likely harvested via infostealer malware, remained exposed for nearly a month before being secured. The incident underscores the ongoing threat of credential theft, even among malicious actors.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Zero-Day VulnerabilitiesGDPR ViolationAI VulnerabilityData Exposure
MOTIVATION
Financial gain (bug bounty)Regulatory violation (GDPR)Data theftMalicious credential harvesting
IMPACT
Financial Loss: €3.5 million fineCustomer loyalty data (email addresses, phone numbers)149 million unique login credentials (social media, banking, government accounts)Private calendar details (via AI prompt injection)Tesla infotainment systemsEV chargers (Alpitronic HYC50)Automotive Grade LinuxGoogle Gemini AIBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage for unnamed GDPR-violating company and Google GeminiLegal Liabilities: GDPR violations (€3.5M fine), potential legal risks for AI prompt injection vulnerabilityIdentity Theft Risk: High (exposed credentials database)
DATA BREACH
Customer loyalty data (email addresses, phone numbers)Login credentials (social media, banking, government accounts)Private calendar details10.5 million (GDPR violation)149 million (exposed credentials database)Sensitivity Of Data: High (PII, financial, government accounts)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (email addresses, phone numbers, login credentials)
DECEMBER 2025
754Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
754Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
754Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
754Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
754Before Incident

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for CAL ?
?
What was CAL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was CAL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was CAL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was CAL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was CAL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was CAL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was CAL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was CAL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was CAL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was CAL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was CAL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on CAL's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with CAL ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view CAL's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?