Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Coanda Research & DevelopmentCoanda Research & Development
VS
Los Alamos National LaboratoryLos Alamos National Laboratory
Coanda Research & Development

Coanda Research & Development

101-5140 N Fraser Way, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5J 0J4, CA

Last Update: 07/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.coanda.ca
750/1000Fair

Coanda, a Tetra Tech company, specializes in solving complex problems in engineering and beyond. Services include process flow modeling, Artificial Intelligence, forensic analysis, instrumentation, design optimization, engineering consulting, software development and t...

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:67
Subsidiaries:35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Los Alamos National Laboratory

Los Alamos National Laboratory

P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, NM, US, 87545

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.lanl.gov/
776/1000Fair

Los Alamos National Laboratory is one of the world’s most innovative multidisciplinary research institutions. We're engaged in strategic science on behalf of national security to ensure the safety and reliability of the U.S. nuclear stockpile. Our workforce specializes ...

NAICS:5417
NAICS Definition:Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees:13,101
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Coanda Research & Development

Coanda Research & Development

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Los Alamos National Laboratory

Los Alamos National Laboratory

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coanda Research & Development in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Los Alamos National Laboratory in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Coanda Research & Development (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coanda Research & Development cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Los Alamos National Laboratory (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Los Alamos National Laboratory cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Coanda Research & Development

Coanda Research & Development

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Los Alamos National Laboratory

Los Alamos National Laboratory

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Coanda Research & Development company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Coanda Research & Development company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Coanda Research & Development company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Coanda Research & Development company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Coanda Research & Development company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Coanda Research & Development company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Coanda Research & Development company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Coanda Research & Development company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Coanda Research & Development company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Coanda Research & Development company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Coanda Research & Development company and Los Alamos National Laboratory company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Coanda Research & Development and Los Alamos National Laboratory, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Coanda Research & Development and Los Alamos National Laboratory, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Coanda Research & Development or Los Alamos National Laboratory ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Coanda Research & Development or Los Alamos National Laboratory ?
Between Coanda Research & Development and Los Alamos National Laboratory, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Coanda Research & Development and Los Alamos National Laboratory, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57100
SUMMARY

Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Entra Provisioning Service (SyncFabric) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-02
UPDATED
Date2026-07-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-54998
SUMMARY

Incorrect authorization in Microsoft Exchange Online allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-02
UPDATED
Date2026-07-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-45499
SUMMARY

Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure OpenAI allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-02
UPDATED
Date2026-07-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-41106
SUMMARY

Url redirection to untrusted site ('open redirect') in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-02
UPDATED
Date2026-07-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-26145
SUMMARY

Improper access control in Azure Synapse allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-02
UPDATED
Date2026-07-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
REFERENCES