Comparison Overview
Coanda Research & Development
Coanda Research & Development
101-5140 N Fraser Way, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5J 0J4, CA
Last Update: 07/12/2025
Coanda, a Tetra Tech company, specializes in solving complex problems in engineering and beyond. Services include process flow modeling, Artificial Intelligence, forensic analysis, instrumentation, design optimization, engineering consulting, software development and t...
Los Alamos National Laboratory
P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, NM, US, 87545
Last Update: 29/03/2026
Los Alamos National Laboratory is one of the world’s most innovative multidisciplinary research institutions. We're engaged in strategic science on behalf of national security to ensure the safety and reliability of the U.S. nuclear stockpile. Our workforce specializes ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Coanda Research & Development
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Coanda Research & Development in 2026.
Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Los Alamos National Laboratory in 2026.
Incident History - Coanda Research & Development (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Coanda Research & Development cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Los Alamos National Laboratory (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Los Alamos National Laboratory cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Coanda Research & Development
Los Alamos National Laboratory
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.