Comparison Overview

CNAM

VS

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

CNAM

50 avenue du Professeur André Lemierre, Paris, Ile-de-France, 75020, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-22

Rejoindre la Caisse nationale de l’Assurance Maladie (Cnam) c’est mettre ses talents au service d’un acteur majeur de la protection sociale française. C’est aussi évoluer au sein de l’un des systèmes d’information les plus importants d’Europe et développer de nouveaux services, pour garantir à nos publics (assurés, professionnels de santé et employeurs) des prestations de qualité au plus près de leurs attentes. C’est enfin veiller à la préservation de notre système de santé en garantissant à la population un égal accès aux droits et aux soins tout en régulant les pratiques et les dépenses pour un juste soin au juste coût. Pour cela, la Cnam s’appuie sur les compétences de 2 220 collaborateurs exerçant une centaine de métiers différents – dont la moitié dans le domaine informatique – répartis sur l’ensemble du territoire.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 3,154
Subsidiaries: 111
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Washington, DC, US, 20528
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 600 and 649

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has a vital mission: to secure the nation from the many threats we face. This requires the hard work of more than 260,000 employees in jobs that range from aviation and border security to emergency response, from cybersecurity analyst to chemical facility inspector. Our duties are wide-ranging, and our goal is clear - keeping America safe. Mission 1: Counter Terrorism and Homeland Security Threats Mission 2: Secure U.S. Borders and Approaches Mission 3: Secure Cyberspace and Critical Infrastructure Mission 4: Preserve and Uphold the Nation's Prosperity and Economic Security Mission 5: Strengthen Preparedness and Resilience Mission 6: Champion the DHS Workforce and Strengthen the Department We continually strengthen our partnerships with communities, first responders, law enforcement and government agencies - at the state, local, tribal, federal and international levels. We are accelerating the deployment of science, technology, and innovation in order to make America more secure. And we are becoming leaner, smarter, and more efficient, ensuring that every security resource is used as effectively as possible. Together, we are committed to relentless resilience, striving to prevent future attacks against the United States and our allies, responding decisively to natural and man-made disasters, and advancing American prosperity and economic security long into the future.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 36,965
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
5

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cnam-caisse-nationale-assurance-maladie.jpeg
CNAM
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/us-department-of-homeland-security.jpeg
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CNAM
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CNAM in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for U.S. Department of Homeland Security in 2025.

Incident History — CNAM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CNAM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — U.S. Department of Homeland Security (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Department of Homeland Security cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cnam-caisse-nationale-assurance-maladie.jpeg
CNAM
Incidents

Date Detected: 03/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Compromise
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 03/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Account Hacking
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/us-department-of-homeland-security.jpeg
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Modified Commercial Drones
Motivation: Impact national security and critical infrastructure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Weaponized Drones
Motivation: To cause harm or disruption using weaponized drones
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Drones
Motivation: Terrorism
Blog: Blog

FAQ

CNAM company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to U.S. Department of Homeland Security company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

U.S. Department of Homeland Security company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to CNAM company.

In the current year, U.S. Department of Homeland Security company and CNAM company have not reported any cyber incidents.

U.S. Department of Homeland Security company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while CNAM company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both U.S. Department of Homeland Security company and CNAM company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

U.S. Department of Homeland Security company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while CNAM company has not reported such incidents publicly.

U.S. Department of Homeland Security company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while CNAM company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither CNAM nor U.S. Department of Homeland Security holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CNAM company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to U.S. Department of Homeland Security company.

U.S. Department of Homeland Security company employs more people globally than CNAM company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither CNAM nor U.S. Department of Homeland Security holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CNAM nor U.S. Department of Homeland Security holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CNAM nor U.S. Department of Homeland Security holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CNAM nor U.S. Department of Homeland Security holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CNAM nor U.S. Department of Homeland Security holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CNAM nor U.S. Department of Homeland Security holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H