Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc.CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc.
VS
MajorelMajorel
CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc.

CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc.

10 North Park Drive, Hunt Valley, 21030, US

Last Update: 26/05/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.cmdosi.com
645/1000Poor

CMD Outsourcing Solutions is a highly specialized contact resolution center addressing the needs of Government (http://www.cmdgsd.com), Higher Education (http://www.cmdosi.com) and Healthcare. For Government we support Sate and Local governments with customer service ...

NAICS:541615
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:45
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Majorel

Majorel

Luxembourg, LU

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

Majorel has been acquired by TP allowing us to deliver even more exceptional services in more locations worldwide and on a greater scale than ever before. We deliver the most advanced, digitally-powered business services to help the world’s best brands streamline their...

NAICS:541615
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:21,276
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc.

CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Majorel

Majorel

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc. has 45.36% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Majorel has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Majorel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Majorel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc.

CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CMD1779834713
Majorel

Majorel

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CYBITA1770216378
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAJ04524723

FAQ

Between CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc. company and Majorel company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc. company and Majorel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc. company and Majorel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc. company and Majorel company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc. company and Majorel company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc. company and Majorel company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc. company and Majorel company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc. company and Majorel company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc. company and Majorel company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc. company and Majorel company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc. company and Majorel company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc. and Majorel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc. and Majorel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc. or Majorel ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc. or Majorel ?
Between CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc. and Majorel, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CMD Outsourcing Solutions, Inc. and Majorel, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA