Comparison Overview
CMC Connect | An IPG Health Company

CMC Connect | An IPG Health Company
19-21 King Edward Street, Macclesfield, SK10 1AQ, GB
Last Update: 20/03/2026
The ability to connect. It’s what makes us human and enables us to progress. By communicating complex science through publications, congress engagement, education and digital and creative experiences, we can improve outcomes and help develop healthcare solutions that ch...

Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine
N/A
Last Update: 18/09/2026
At Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, we innovate with purpose, to lead where medicine is going. The experiences of patients around the world inform and inspire our science-based innovations, which continue to change and save lives. Applying rigorous science with co...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

CMC Connect | An IPG Health Company







Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for CMC Connect | An IPG Health Company in 2026.
Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine in 2026.
Incident History - CMC Connect | An IPG Health Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CMC Connect | An IPG Health Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

CMC Connect | An IPG Health Company

Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.