Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Cloudy Bay VineyardsCloudy Bay Vineyards
VS
DiageoDiageo
Cloudy Bay Vineyards

Cloudy Bay Vineyards

N/A

Last Update: 30/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cloudybay.com
772/1000Fair

The Cloudy Bay story is one of adventure, vision and commitment. In 1983 David Hohnen tasted his first Marlborough Sauvignon Blanc. Captivated by its intensity, he began a journey to bottle the essence of Marlborough and share it with the world. David and winemaker Kevi...

NAICS:3121
NAICS Definition:Beverage Manufacturing
Employees:76
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Diageo

Diageo

Lakeside Drive, Park Royal, London, GB, NW10 7HQ

Last Update: 05/10/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://diageo.com
831/1000Good

Diageo's official LinkedIn account. We're a global leader in premium drinks, across spirits and beer, a business built on the principles and foundations laid by the giants of the industry. With over 200 brands sold in 180 countries, our portfolio has remarkable breadth...

NAICS:3121
NAICS Definition:Beverage Manufacturing
Employees:33,458
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cloudy Bay Vineyards

Cloudy Bay Vineyards

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Diageo

Diageo

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cloudy Bay Vineyards in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Diageo in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Cloudy Bay Vineyards (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cloudy Bay Vineyards cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Diageo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Diageo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cloudy Bay Vineyards

Cloudy Bay Vineyards

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Diageo

Diageo

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Cloudy Bay Vineyards company and Diageo company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cloudy Bay Vineyards company and Diageo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cloudy Bay Vineyards company and Diageo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cloudy Bay Vineyards company and Diageo company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cloudy Bay Vineyards company and Diageo company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cloudy Bay Vineyards company and Diageo company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cloudy Bay Vineyards company and Diageo company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cloudy Bay Vineyards company and Diageo company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cloudy Bay Vineyards company and Diageo company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cloudy Bay Vineyards company and Diageo company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cloudy Bay Vineyards company and Diageo company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cloudy Bay Vineyards and Diageo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cloudy Bay Vineyards and Diageo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cloudy Bay Vineyards or Diageo ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cloudy Bay Vineyards or Diageo ?
Between Cloudy Bay Vineyards and Diageo, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cloudy Bay Vineyards and Diageo, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3