Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CloudstaffCloudstaff
VS
Grupo BrasanitasGrupo Brasanitas
Cloudstaff

Cloudstaff

Sydney, New South Wales, AU, 2000

Last Update: 12/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.cloudstaff.com/
772/1000Fair

We are Cloudstaff, the remote staffing pioneer that combines ethical outsourcing with enterprise-grade people tech. We connect businesses embarking on remarkable growth with the world’s top talent from our pool of over 1M professionals. Brilliant careers for your future...

NAICS:541615
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:4,691
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Grupo Brasanitas

Grupo Brasanitas

Rua João Moura, 650, São Paulo, 05412-001, BR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
774/1000Fair

O Grupo Brasanitas é composto por quatro empresas, Brasanitas Limpeza e Conservação, Brasanitas Hospitalar, Praxxis Controle de Pragas e Infralink Facilities Services, o Grupo Brasanitas atua em indústrias em geral, hospitais, shopping centers, instituições de ensino, m...

NAICS:541615
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:10,818
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cloudstaff

Cloudstaff

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Grupo Brasanitas

Grupo Brasanitas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cloudstaff in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo Brasanitas in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Cloudstaff (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cloudstaff cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Grupo Brasanitas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Brasanitas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cloudstaff

Cloudstaff

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Grupo Brasanitas

Grupo Brasanitas

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Cloudstaff company and Grupo Brasanitas company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cloudstaff company and Grupo Brasanitas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cloudstaff company and Grupo Brasanitas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cloudstaff company and Grupo Brasanitas company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cloudstaff company and Grupo Brasanitas company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cloudstaff company and Grupo Brasanitas company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cloudstaff company and Grupo Brasanitas company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cloudstaff company and Grupo Brasanitas company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cloudstaff company and Grupo Brasanitas company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cloudstaff company and Grupo Brasanitas company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cloudstaff company and Grupo Brasanitas company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cloudstaff and Grupo Brasanitas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cloudstaff and Grupo Brasanitas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cloudstaff or Grupo Brasanitas ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cloudstaff or Grupo Brasanitas ?
Between Cloudstaff and Grupo Brasanitas, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cloudstaff and Grupo Brasanitas, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8