Comparison Overview

CTS

VS

Thoughtworks

CTS

Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 700 and 749

We are the largest Google Cloud-only digital consultancy in Europe, and our mission is to change the way technology works for business. CTS and Appsbroker are now a single unified powerhouse for both strategic consulting and best-in-class engineering, offering one Google experience that delivers real business impact. Our experience and credibility are perfectly suited to meet the rapidly growing demand for seamless AI, martech, data, and cloud security solutions. With offices in the UK, Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, and Romania, we’re closer to our customers than ever before, and uniquely positioned to help them - and their clients - across financial services, retail, manufacturing and the public sector. Our values echo our status as a certified B Corporation, and we pride ourselves on making a positive and sustainable difference in the world.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 893
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Thoughtworks

200 E Randolph St, Chicago, IL, 60601-6501, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Thoughtworks is a pioneering global technology consultancy, leading the charge in custom software development and technology innovation. We empower ambitious businesses to thrive in a constantly evolving world. We integrate the best of strategy, design, and software engineering to provide our clients with the foundations they need to excel. Our 30+ years of hands-on experience enables us to help our clients navigate change effectively, harness the power of data and AI to unlock new sources of value, and create adaptable technology platforms that align seamlessly with their business objectives. We are a team of 10,500 talented Thoughtworkers across 19 countries. Here, computer science grads come together with seasoned technologists, self-taught developers, midlife career changers and more to learn from and challenge each other. Career journeys flourish with the strength of our cultivation culture, which has won awards around the world.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 11,241
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cloud-technology-solutions.jpeg
CTS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thoughtworks.jpeg
Thoughtworks
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CTS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Thoughtworks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CTS in 2025.

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thoughtworks in 2025.

Incident History — CTS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CTS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Thoughtworks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thoughtworks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cloud-technology-solutions.jpeg
CTS
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Malware
Attack Vector: Unidentified cyber event
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thoughtworks.jpeg
Thoughtworks
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Thoughtworks company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CTS company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

CTS company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Thoughtworks company has not reported any.

In the current year, Thoughtworks company and CTS company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Thoughtworks company nor CTS company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Thoughtworks company nor CTS company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Thoughtworks company nor CTS company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CTS company nor Thoughtworks company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CTS nor Thoughtworks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Thoughtworks company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CTS company.

Thoughtworks company employs more people globally than CTS company, reflecting its scale as a Information Technology & Services.

Neither CTS nor Thoughtworks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CTS nor Thoughtworks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CTS nor Thoughtworks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CTS nor Thoughtworks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CTS nor Thoughtworks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CTS nor Thoughtworks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H