Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM)Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM)
VS
AmgenAmgen
Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM)

Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM)

820 W Diamond Ave, Gaithersburg, Maryland, undefined, US

Last Update: 17/11/2025

View Profile

ClinicalRM is now ICON Government and Public Health Solutions (GPHS) follow us at the LinkedIn page below

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:173
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Amgen

Amgen

One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA, US, 91320

Last Update: 05/07/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.amgen.com
821/1000Good

Amgen harnesses the best of biology and technology to fight the world’s toughest diseases, and make people’s lives easier, fuller and longer. We helped establish the biotechnology industry, and we remain on the cutting-edge of innovation, using technology and human gene...

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:39,570
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM)

Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Amgen

Amgen

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amgen in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Amgen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amgen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM)

Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Amgen

Amgen

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AMG552072825

FAQ

Between Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM) company and Amgen company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM) company and Amgen company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM) company and Amgen company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM) company and Amgen company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM) company and Amgen company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM) company and Amgen company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM) company and Amgen company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM) company and Amgen company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM) company and Amgen company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM) company and Amgen company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM) company and Amgen company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM) and Amgen, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM) and Amgen, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM) or Amgen ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM) or Amgen ?
Between Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM) and Amgen, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Clinical Research Management, Inc. (ClinicalRM) and Amgen, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1