Comparison Overview

Clinic

VS

dentsu

Clinic

20-24 Broadwick St, Soho, London, GB, W1F 8HT
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Clinic is an independent creative agency. We create bold ideas, and craft them beautifully, to get people thinking, believing and doing. All of our experience goes into what we do today, and although our world’s constantly changing, the endpoint is still people and their experience, no matter what the context or media. Born a Virgin company, the core principles of challenging the norm and putting people front and centre have served us well over the years. And they’ve served the many brands we’ve worked with even better. What does that mean in the real world? Launching products & services, increasing subscriber numbers, helping multi-faceted businesses feel human and showing brands how to be themselves. Whatever we’re doing, the core is understanding people and solving problems creatively. It’s what we’ve done for over 30 years, and it still drives us forward. We call it being something else.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 16,986
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

dentsu

1-8-1 Higashi-shimbashi, Tokyo, JP
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 650 and 699

We are dentsu. We team together to help brands predict and plan for disruptive future opportunities and create new paths to growth in the sustainable economy. We know people better than anyone else and we use those insights to connect brand, content, commerce and experience, underpinned by modern creativity. We are the network designed for what’s next.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 17,547
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clinic.jpeg
Clinic
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dentsu.jpeg
dentsu
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Clinic
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
dentsu
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clinic in 2025.

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

dentsu has 119.78% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Clinic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clinic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — dentsu (X = Date, Y = Severity)

dentsu cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clinic.jpeg
Clinic
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dentsu.jpeg
dentsu
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Clinic company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to dentsu company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

dentsu company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Clinic company has not reported any.

In the current year, dentsu company has reported more cyber incidents than Clinic company.

Neither dentsu company nor Clinic company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

dentsu company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Clinic company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither dentsu company nor Clinic company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Clinic company nor dentsu company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Clinic nor dentsu holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Clinic company nor dentsu company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

dentsu company employs more people globally than Clinic company, reflecting its scale as a Advertising Services.

Neither Clinic nor dentsu holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Clinic nor dentsu holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Clinic nor dentsu holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Clinic nor dentsu holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Clinic nor dentsu holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Clinic nor dentsu holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N