Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Client 1st Advisory GroupClient 1st Advisory Group
VS
Grupo SalinasGrupo Salinas
Client 1st Advisory Group

Client 1st Advisory Group

611 Druid Road East, Clearwater, 33756, US

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://c1ag.com
727/1000Moderate

Welcome to Client 1st Advisory Group. We are truly a firm like no other. In our core values we believe in investing smarter, safer and better on a solid financial platform based on your individual goals. As an independent advisor, our sole allegiance is to our client....

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:11
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Grupo Salinas

Grupo Salinas

MX

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gruposalinas.com
793/1000Fair

Grupo Salinas es un conjunto de empresas dinámicas, que se caracterizan por la evolución constante y la innovación, enfocadas en la creación de valor económico, social y ambiental. Estamos en industrias diversas como comercio especializado, servicios financieros, tele...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:25,796
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Client 1st Advisory Group

Client 1st Advisory Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Grupo Salinas

Grupo Salinas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Client 1st Advisory Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo Salinas in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Client 1st Advisory Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Client 1st Advisory Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Grupo Salinas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Salinas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Client 1st Advisory Group

Client 1st Advisory Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CLI413071725
Grupo Salinas

Grupo Salinas

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Client 1st Advisory Group company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Client 1st Advisory Group company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Client 1st Advisory Group company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Client 1st Advisory Group company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Client 1st Advisory Group company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Client 1st Advisory Group company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Client 1st Advisory Group company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Client 1st Advisory Group company and Grupo Salinas company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Client 1st Advisory Group company and Grupo Salinas company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Client 1st Advisory Group company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Client 1st Advisory Group company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Client 1st Advisory Group and Grupo Salinas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Client 1st Advisory Group and Grupo Salinas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Client 1st Advisory Group or Grupo Salinas ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Client 1st Advisory Group or Grupo Salinas ?
Between Client 1st Advisory Group and Grupo Salinas, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Client 1st Advisory Group and Grupo Salinas, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3