Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ClearfieldClearfield
VS
Lumen TechnologiesLumen Technologies
Clearfield

Clearfield

7050 Winnetka Ave., Minneapolis, 55428, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
749/1000Moderate

Clearfield, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLFD) designs, manufactures, and distributes fiber optic management, protection, and delivery solutions that play a critical role in enabling broadband operators to close the digital divide. Our labor-lite, craft-friendly platform is leveraged ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:294
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Lumen Technologies

Lumen Technologies

Monroe, Louisiana , US, 71203

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lumen.com
758/1000Fair

Lumen connects the world. We digitally connect people, data and applications – quickly, securely and effortlessly. Everything we do at Lumen takes advantage of our network strength. From metro connectivity to long-haul data transport to our edge cloud, security, and man...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:49,841
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Clearfield

Clearfield

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Lumen Technologies

Lumen Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clearfield in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lumen Technologies in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Clearfield (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clearfield cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Lumen Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lumen Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Clearfield

Clearfield

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CLE141224522
Lumen Technologies

Lumen Technologies

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
LUM33321023

FAQ

Between Clearfield company and Lumen Technologies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Clearfield company and Lumen Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Clearfield company and Lumen Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Clearfield company and Lumen Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Clearfield company and Lumen Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Clearfield company and Lumen Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Clearfield company and Lumen Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Clearfield company and Lumen Technologies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Clearfield company and Lumen Technologies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Clearfield company and Lumen Technologies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Clearfield company and Lumen Technologies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Clearfield and Lumen Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Clearfield and Lumen Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Clearfield or Lumen Technologies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Clearfield or Lumen Technologies ?
Between Clearfield and Lumen Technologies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Clearfield and Lumen Technologies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA