Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical CampusClaxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus
VS
Amsterdam UMCAmsterdam UMC
Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus

Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus

214 King Street, Ogdensburg, 13669, US

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://claxtonhepburn.org
750/1000Fair

Claxton-Hepburn Medical Campus Building on the proud legacy of Claxton-Hepburn Medical Center (CHMC), the Claxton-Hepburn Medical Campus (Claxton Campus) is dedicated to meeting the emergency and acute care needs of our community. With a commitment to delivering compass...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:371
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Amsterdam UMC

Amsterdam UMC

Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1100 DE, NL

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
787/1000Fair

At Amsterdam UMC, more than 15,000 professionals strive to provide good and accessible care. For the generations of today and tomorrow. The two medical university centers in Amsterdam, AMC and VUmc, are working together towards a future in which we prevent illnesses and...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:18,002
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus

Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Amsterdam UMC

Amsterdam UMC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amsterdam UMC in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Amsterdam UMC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amsterdam UMC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus

Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CLA1564923
Amsterdam UMC

Amsterdam UMC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus company and Amsterdam UMC company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus company and Amsterdam UMC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus company and Amsterdam UMC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus company and Amsterdam UMC company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus company and Amsterdam UMC company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus company and Amsterdam UMC company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus company and Amsterdam UMC company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus company and Amsterdam UMC company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus company and Amsterdam UMC company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus company and Amsterdam UMC company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus company and Amsterdam UMC company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus and Amsterdam UMC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus and Amsterdam UMC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus or Amsterdam UMC ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus or Amsterdam UMC ?
Between Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus and Amsterdam UMC, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Claxton Hepburn Medical Center & Medical Campus and Amsterdam UMC, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2