Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Claudie PierlotClaudie Pierlot
VS
Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd.Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd.
Claudie Pierlot

Claudie Pierlot

Paris, Ile-de-France, FR, 75001

Last Update: 30/12/2025

View Profile
766/1000Fair

Claudie Pierlot is a Parisian fashion house founded in 1984 by her eponymous designer. Claudie Pierlot invents a look that is both chic and effortless, out of tune with the trends of the time. In 2011, the artistic direction of the House is entrusted to Vanessa Pierra...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:415
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd.

Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd.

Piramal Agastya Corporate Park, Building 'A', 4th and 5th Floor, Unit No. 401, 403, 501, 502, L.B.S. Road, Kurla, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400070

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.abfrl.com/
763/1000Fair

Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Limited (ABFRL), part of the Aditya Birla Group, is India’s leading fashion powerhouse, offering a distinguished portfolio of renowned brands and retail formats, catering to multiple high-growth segments. As of March 31, 2025, the Compan...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:14,033
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Claudie Pierlot

Claudie Pierlot

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd.

Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Claudie Pierlot in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Claudie Pierlot (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Claudie Pierlot cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Claudie Pierlot

Claudie Pierlot

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd.

Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Claudie Pierlot company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Claudie Pierlot company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Claudie Pierlot company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Claudie Pierlot company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Claudie Pierlot company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Claudie Pierlot company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Claudie Pierlot company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Claudie Pierlot company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Claudie Pierlot company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Claudie Pierlot company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Claudie Pierlot company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Claudie Pierlot and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Claudie Pierlot and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Claudie Pierlot or Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Claudie Pierlot or Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. ?
Between Claudie Pierlot and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Claudie Pierlot and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3